179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: jungle "complex"? (was Re: a note on Instinct)

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-01-01 18:43Ryan G. Pals (idm) Re: jungle "complex"? (was Re: a note on Instinct)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-01-01 18:43Ryan G. Pals>>> Without meaning to dis GD in particular, I'd just like to address his statement re. ju
From:
Ryan G. Pals
To:
Date:
Mon, 1 Jan 1996 13:43:33 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Re: jungle "complex"? (was Re: a note on Instinct)
permalink · <199601011843.NAA03331@kanga.INS.CWRU.Edu>
quoted 1 line>>>
Without meaning to dis GD in particular, I'd just like to address his statement re. jungle's supposedly "more" complex rhythms -- this is a cliche that's oft repeated, but seldom questioned. So, *what* exactly are jungle rhythms more complex than? <<< The "complex" rhythms bit is kind of silly. People just say jungle's got a complex rhythm cos they feel it's too fast and too layered to dance to. Isn't that silly? If more jungle would really work at creating complex rhythms instead of sampling a few records and layering the effects the genre would have moved forward a long time ago. Amen ragga got boring, now there's the hip hop style. Eh... Anyway, I completely agreed with the above quoted post.