179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: Bad software (was Re: Bad SW envelopes? !! (fwd)

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1995-03-31 22:57Kent Williams Re: Bad software (was Re: Bad SW envelopes? !! (fwd)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1995-03-31 22:57Kent WilliamsOn Mar 31, 2:33pm, Vance Gloster wrote: > Subject: Re: Bad software (was Re: Bad SW envelo
From:
Kent Williams
To:
, ,
Date:
Fri, 31 Mar 1995 16:57:38 -0600
Subject:
Re: Bad software (was Re: Bad SW envelopes? !! (fwd)
permalink · <9503311657.ZM20720@elvis.cadsi.com>
On Mar 31, 2:33pm, Vance Gloster wrote:
quoted 10 lines Subject: Re: Bad software (was Re: Bad SW envelopes? !! (fwd)> Subject: Re: Bad software (was Re: Bad SW envelopes? !! (fwd) > But... In a properly architected C program, I could of done the same thing > by adding the calling of the sound event to my generic ButtonDown handler. > > I'm not trying to re-invent the wheel, I'm just pissed at all the space it > takes for a C++ program to define it's damn classes and the structures > required to support them. It's insane. > > Is it just me or does a discussion of digital programming styles seem > a little off-topic on Analogue Heaven?
Yessiree bobtails. Since I can Do Things Like That, I've created a mailing list for this fooferaw: Send your messages to musicnerds@cadsi.com Send subscription requests to musicnerds-request@cadsi.com Then we can discuss the finer points of interrupt latency as it influences the works of Giorgio Moroder ... Really, if you want to splinter off this sort of thing, send mail to the above ... -- kent.williams@cadsi.com -- All views expressed are. Sabado Gigante! "Someone please explain to me the guy in the bee costume on Univision!"