| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1999-05-1121:10 | Sharon Maher <smaher@looksmart.net> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno > which ones stand out from ten years ago??
Skinny Puppy.
--sharon
|
| 1999-05-1120:54 | Dave Walker <marmoset@mich.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno > and please use a different term
> to generalize all electronic music rather… |
| 1999-05-1121:13 | David Hodgson <dhodgson@microsoft.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno >How many techno records will stand out to you in 10 years… |
| 1999-05-1302:15 | <Crtrdge003@aol.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno In a message dated 5/11/99 4:07:33 PM Mountain… |
| 1999-05-1120:54 | daniel <daniel@eliteware.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno Chester Blaze wrote:
> to generalize all electronic music rather than techno. techno… |
| 1999-05-1123:09 | Chester Blaze <webmaster@reachsports.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno
> The House comment is simply wrong. I call to the stand Mr… |
| 1999-05-1122:06 | Chester Blaze <webmaster@reachsports.com> | (idm) Heck-no to Techno
> Chester Blaze wrote:
>
>> to generalize all electronic music rather than techno. techno… |
| 1999-05-1122:05 | Chester Blaze <webmaster@reachsports.com> | (idm) Heck-no to Techno
> And Moby is not crap music. Moby showed me that music could… |
| 1999-05-1119:57 | Andrew Hime <hime@kali.wf.net> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno > How many techno records will stand out to you in 10 years… |
| 1999-05-1120:35 | Mike Baugh <meek@home.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno
>> How many techno records will stand out to you in 10 years… |
| 1999-05-1201:48 | ~\(\({\[Endemic~Distortion\]}\)\)~ <jpklein@flash.net> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno The House comment is simply wrong. I call to the stand Mr… |
| 1999-05-1200:37 | Will Samuels <w_technoir@yahoo.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno
--- Chester Blaze |
| 1999-05-1213:59 | david turgeon <eerie@mnemonic.net> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno
> my Skinny Puppy collection still makes me happy, and they fit into… |
| 1999-05-1210:08 | Michael Upton <jet.jaguar@eudoramail.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno On Wed, 12 May 1999 03:01:17 Michael Upton wrote:
>Also… |
| 1999-05-1121:43 | Tomas Jirku <tomas@yirku.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno >which ones stand out from ten years ago??
not a whole lot… |
| 1999-05-1208:04 | martin wood <martin.wood@advent-comm.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno there is a load of good house music (pal joey, reggie burrell… |
| 1999-05-1120:18 | Chester Blaze <webmaster@reachsports.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno
>
> So whats the point here? Sometimes in order to move forward you… |
| 1999-05-2803:50 | solenoid <solenoid@syncopated.net> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno On Tue, 11 May 1999, Moonlight wrote:
> used for a subgenre that… |
| 1999-05-1121:00 | Moonlight <roesch@augsburg.edu> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno >and please use a different term to generalize all electronic music rather… |
| 1999-05-1210:01 | Michael Upton <jet.jaguar@eudoramail.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno >In my opinion -- there is a certain kind of "arrogance" inherent in… |
| 1999-05-2818:19 | R. Lim <rlim@escape.com> | Re: (idm) Heck-no to Techno On Thu, 27 May 1999, solenoid wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 1999… |
| 1999-05-1119:50 | Peter T. Bense <textures@techno.org> | (idm) Heck-no to Techno WARNING: THIS E-MAIL CONTAINS MANY EXTREME AND SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS. READ
WITH… |