179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Jon Drukman
To:
Insipid Dance Musick
Date:
20 May 1994 16:17:29 -0800
Subject:
Re: New Thread!!!
Msg-Id:
<199405210119.SAA23056@netcomsv.netcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9405.gz
RE>>New Thread!!! i promise i won't prolong this thread past this but i wanted to clear up a few misconceptions... michael dvorkin wrote (about the EPS): <<It is not bad, but isn't it mono, and it doesn't have that much memory...>> you can expand it to 4MB which isn't a huge amount by today's standards but it's enough to hold plenty of decent sounds in memory at once. it's true that it only samples in mono, but that rarely is an issue. you can link two sounds and pan them hard left & right if you want to fake it. i know it's not the same thing, but it's an idea anyway. anyway, i can't think of any stereo samplers that are trading for $700.... <<Depends on which one.... The only 2 SCI's that are usually below $300 are the Six Track (which has a very cool filter, and nice envelope generators...) and the Pro One>> There's also the Multi-Trak which is basically the same as the Six Trak only with a better editing interface, built in chorus, and multiple outputs. <<The better choice for the analogue synth per price shall still be an Oberheim MATRIX 6R, it gives you a lot of modulation flexibility (it is a downscaled version of Xpander, which is the SYNTH)... You can always get them cheaper than $350, and they are far better than SCI SixTracks...>> That's true but they are much harder to program. Basically I think it's completely impossible without some sort of external editor program (like Opcode's very own Galaxy! end of commercial). And if you're going to go that route, you can always get Oberheim's Matrix-1000 which is basically the same as the Matrix-6 without any editing controls whatsoever (so you MUST use a computer editor). The advantage to that is it's smaller (1 rack space) and it has 800 preset (ROM) sounds, plus room for 200 user defined sounds! also, in terms of sound quality, i think the Matrixes (matrices?) have a "cleaner" sort of sound. sometimes that sequential "mud" is crucial for phat bass. (we're getting very subjective here, kids. can you tell?)
quoted 3 lines Make sure you get one that>> Make sure you get one that >> understands MIDI. >It is pretty important, but you can always use the CV/Gate IN/Outs
if you buy a separate (read: more $$$) MIDI->CV conversion box.
quoted 5 lines Most of the old Sequential gear gives you access to all the>> Most of the old Sequential gear gives you access to all the >> sound creation parameters via MIDI control, which is cool for making >> sounds warp >> and evolve. >Not so.... From SCI's below $300 Only Six Track does, and not to the fullest
extend. no, you can control every single parameter on the 6 Trak via MIDI. trust me. (besides, there aren't that many). /jon