Roy Badami said:
quoted 9 lines So why couldn't System 7 release a record as so in the states? Are
> > So why couldn't System 7 release a record as so in the states? Are
> > Apple's lawyers just *too* picky?
>
> Apple claim they're trademarks are applicable to the field of music,
> because they're computers have audio capabilities.... (ie not only
> could they sue a computer manufacturer who called the system System 7,
> they could sue a synth manufacturer who did that too... but they
> couldn't, say, sue a manufacturer who called a vacuum cleaner System
> 7....)
Hey, but wait a minute. Weren't Apple (computers) only allowed to use
*their* name if they stayed away from music?? After all, there is/was
Apple records (Y'know the Beatles and all that).
What a crazy mixed-up world we live in. :-). Huh!
john..
--
.ATARI.st.CASIO.ht700.KORG.ex800.OSC.oscar.POWERTRAN.transcendent2000.
.ROLAND.sh2.tr606.cr8000.SCI.sixtrak.YAMAHA.dx7ii.pf10.
solo ContinuousEvolution
with i.s.gibson: quanta/flex
<<<<Ambient/Techno Tape available now.....Send C60>>>>