179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
John D.
To:
IDM List
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:34:15 +0800
Subject:
Re: waffles
Msg-Id:
<5448A167.6060106@pchome.com.tw>
In-Reply-To:
<CAD28JQgyNmL9hw4_X2rTWb8rcKVWFze4XacDXHNnbwkuz9KaUw@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2014-10.gz
Might work. Maybe an artist could have an individual app. I like my idea though. "Want some claps here? Pay just $.09!"
quoted 65 lines nah, more like, you have an album, but to unlock extra bonus tracks,> nah, more like, you have an album, but to unlock extra bonus tracks, > you have to pay 0.99EUR or so. and then they'd be inside the app. > > > On 23 October 2014 05:19, John D. <johndalton@pchome.com.tw > <mailto:johndalton@pchome.com.tw>> wrote: > > With sounds missing, like? It could be ambient maybe unless you > purchased the beats. > >> there's that word "decent" right between "got" and "monetization". >> >> i wonder if an album app with in-app-purchases would make a dime >> >> --- >> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >> http://lackluster.org >> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >> >>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:52, Esa Juhani Ruoho <esaruoho@gmail.com >>> <mailto:esaruoho@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> so anyone think Best Fiends has got monetization or is it all an >>> in-app-purchase rip-off? >>> >>> --- >>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com <http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/> >>> http://lackluster.org <http://lackluster.org/> >>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com <http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/> >>> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >>> >>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:22tape@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Be well, my friend, Jon. >>>> >>>> On Oct 22, 2014 3:49 PM, "Jon Sands" <fohdeesha@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:fohdeesha@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 10/22/2014 3:31 PM, Jared Dunne wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, the beautiful human trait of deflection. >>>> >>>> >>>> Nah, I think I just speak for the majority of this list >>>> (and Zack summed it up well) that nobody is really >>>> interested in wasting any more effort responding to the >>>> extremely poor straw man you have repeatedly tried to make. >>>> We'd rather talk about something interesting. I think the >>>> moment you made the hilarious comparison of physical >>>> objects to copyright, most of the people here lost interest >>>> in you. It's ok though, I'm sure you'll get some poor sap >>>> here soon willing to argue with you >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jon Sands >>>> Fohdeesha Media >>>> http://fohdeesha.com/ >>>> >>> >> > >