179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Artie Qewpie
To:
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:17:54 -0400
Subject:
Re: idm list dissed
Msg-Id:
<54220DB2.9080200@tymnet.net>
In-Reply-To:
<54220CE8.5060904@tymnet.net>
Mbox:
idm-2014-09.gz
And how could one forget this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRT3fXEmERs On 9/23/2014 8:14 PM, Artie Qewpie wrote:
quoted 98 lines TRAP -- TRAP Recursive Acid Puns> TRAP -- TRAP Recursive Acid Puns > > (take that, you chipmunk sampler genre...) > > On 9/23/2014 7:44 PM, Connor Higgins wrote: >> I Don't Mind IDM. It Definitely Makes Identifying Delicious Music >> Inherently Doable Mentally. Interesting Discussion Mates: Intellectually >> Decisive Minds Interpreting Dependable Magazines. >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Clint Anderson <clinta@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> i dislike country music as an entire genre >>> >>> >>> Clint Anderson >>> Systems Engineer >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Wes <wesley.macdonald@hotmail.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I think it should be called music. But people do need a way to lookout >>>> certain styles or ideas that they're searching for so categorisation >>>> does >>>> have a purpose. What I don't like is people disliking an entire >>>> genre of >>>> music, some songs are better or worse than others regardless of style. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 23 Sep 2014, at 16:57, Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I never understood why so much time is wasted on bitching about a >>>> name of >>>> a genre of music. Better things..... >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Zombiefly <zombiefly@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> i always preferred the label "electronica" for the genre. But at the >>>>> time IDM came to be because the UK was dancing in fields to 4-4 >>>>> beat piano >>>>> tracks inter-dispersed with hoover sounds. It was viewed that >>>>> Autechre etc. >>>>> was more "listening music", therefore more intelligent than the >>>>> generic >>>>> fodder blasting into the countryside at 6am.... i guess :) >>>>> >>>>> On 23 September 2014 13:32, kawayama <kawayama@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> bit too much nit-picking and defensiveness going on here, i think. >>>>>> "intelligent dance music" is an okay name for a mailing list, but a >>>>>> horrible name for a genre, can we not all agree on that? >>>>>> >>>>>> and Warp only named their compilation "artificial intelligence", >>>>>> as in >>>>>> the scientific concept, they never claimed the music was more >>>>>> intelligent >>>>>> than other music. in fact, Warp called it 'listening music' in the >>>>>> liner >>>>>> notes. it was the creators of this list who named it. >>>>>> >>>>>> k >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> constant shallowness leads to evil. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> _____________________________________________ >>>>> Sent from my Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48K >>>>> _____________________________________________ >>>>> noise I make: >>>>> http://www.soundcloud.com/pushkin >>>>> http://www.last.fm/music/Pushkin >>>>> >>>>> noise I like: >>>>> http://www.last.fm/user/zombiefly >>>>> >>>>> sites I run: >>>>> http://www.ctran.co.uk >>>>> http://o-fu-online.net >>>>> ------------------------------- >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 22tape/jared dunne >>>> listen <http://22tape.com> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
-- --arturius qewpie that which is, is wat