179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
A. Mukerjee
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 16 Oct 96 14:54:17 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: MIDI/MOD trackers
Msg-Id:
<199710261902.OAA04831@ns.thethinker.com>
Mbox:
idm.9710.gz
quoted 1 line>
quoted 21 lines On Wednesday, 16-Oct-96, A. Mukerjee wrote [about Re: (idm) Re: MIDI/MOD>On Wednesday, 16-Oct-96, A. Mukerjee wrote [about Re: (idm) Re: MIDI/MOD >trackers]: >>Most demos are mods?? I think not. > >well.. I don't see my stuff as mods, even though they are made with the >tracker, because they have MIDI stuff in them. Usually I use the samples for >drums, and then MIDI for everything else, because my synth can only use the >same pair of effects in a song, and I usually always use distorted drumkits. > >but still. why doesn't CuBase/Performer/blah/blah have a tracker editor for >editing? it already has a notation editor. why not a tracker one? It would >make it way easier to make complex drum sequences (again, how the hell does >Richard, Ae, etc. do it?) > > __ > __\ \ > / /_\ \ > \_____/ > > www.freq-div.home.ml.org >
IT does. tracker editor??? Cubase AUDio VST uses samples just like those mod players do...but with shit loads of effects processing..Declicking, hum removal.....! A. Mukerjee Vassar College "Laws are like cobwebs; where the small flies get caught but the big break ones through." - Unknown