179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Christopher William Niemitz
Cc:
afo ,
Date:
Tue, 14 Jan 1997 16:41:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) aphex in rolling stones
Msg-Id:
<Pine.PMDF.3.91.970114162107.578844465A-100000@cnsvax.albany.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.NEB.3.91.970113215301.2472C-100000@angus.ucsc.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9701.gz
Martian, (newbie with something to say), writes regarding the mtv thread ,(attached):
quoted 1 line This seems to be true. MTV (US) has increased the time slots of their>> This seems to be true. MTV (US) has increased the time slots of their
premiere dance music video program AMP. While they have begun to put more electronic videos into their rotation (as has been reported by billboard and cmj list). However, I'm not exactly sure all of this mainstream exposure is a bad thing. The important fact is that this intergration takes place on the terms of the audience of and creative force behind the music. Isn't the point to "share the vibe"? History has shown us that any musical trend that is even the most remotely marketable --read profitable-- by the capitalist musical purist will be co-opted by the mainstream. It's going to happen if not today, tomorrow. Our focus should be on controlling the cultural share of the music and making sure that this gets included in the package. Hip Hop is strugglin' to start to do this --artist like De la Soul, Juru the Damaja, The Roots and IDM favourite DJ Shadow. We can't afford to start our struggle for the intellectual control of the future direction of the music ten years after our music starts to break into the mainstream. We must realize our goals Now. All our brethen in Europe will tell you that MTV europe regularly has been and continue to broadcast dance music in europe --where it is mainstream. My belaboured point is Mainstream doesn't necessecarily mean Bad. The negative influence of mass appeal is only there when the product and the means to produce are taken out of the underground and put in the grubby hands of record executive that care more about profits than progression. Let's not be musical elitist here....that the game of the purist and industry folk. I rather bast in the plur , reflect and meditate. The more that do it with me the merrier. opinions? btw--am i the only one who has issue with the term "intelligent" being placed in front of genres to further sub divide them? ~\\\//~ (6 6) {---------------oOOO--(_)--OOOo---------------} | /---------------------------------\ | | | SUNY University at Albany | | | \---------------------------------/ | | E-mail: mm1710@cnsvax.albany.edu | | E-mail: martian@usa.net | {_________________________Oooo._______________} .oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- origins of a thread? On Mon, 13 Jan 1997, Christopher William Niemitz wrote:
quoted 18 lines On Mon, 13 Jan 1997, afo wrote:> On Mon, 13 Jan 1997, afo wrote: > > > i feel somewhat discontent thinking that electronica (idm, techno etc.) > > may be the next "grunge" of america...once (IF) electronica surfaces to > > it seems to be true. when i went to visit mum for the holidays > (i don't have a tv, so i watch lots when i visit for > the holidays, since there's also not much else to do) > i saw "firestarter" by the progidy & "setting sun" > by the chem. bros. more times than any other video > in rotation on MTV (that is when they actually get around > to playing videos...). I mentioned this to someone, who > told me MTV is changing its format for '97 & going to > play more electronica (apparently grunge has died, rap > is on its last legs & "alternative" isn't anymore...) > > >