179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Dave Manning
To:
John Branch
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 25 Aug 1995 17:41:58 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: IDM is too tame
Msg-Id:
<Pine.3.05.9508251757.A5625-b100000@cwis.unomaha.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<v01510100ac6390664419@[128.83.136.139]>
Mbox:
idm.9508.gz
On Fri, 25 Aug 1995, John Branch wrote:
quoted 6 lines If, otoh, IDM means Intelligent Dance Music, then there is lots of stuff> If, otoh, IDM means Intelligent Dance Music, then there is lots of stuff > that is out there blowing my mind. Jungle crossovers, jazz crossovers, > trip-hop (I hate that term), etc. There's the lounge fusion of Jimi Tenor > and Jake S., jungle remixes of Mo' Wax, Mo' Wax Excursions, stuff like > Jammin' Unit meets Chemical Dub, James Bong records, I could go on for > hours.
Thankfully, the IDM list has adapted quite well in this regard. I *never* would have picked up a Mo' Wax disc had not a couple of friendly employees at Record Time in Detroit crossreferenced _Headz_ with some of the more "classical" Detroit tunes I was listening to. I guess IDM is what we define it to be, and with people like Dave Walker, Kent Williams, Jon Drukman, etc., "straying" out of the Artificial Intelligence model with greater frequency, we all get a tast of something new. Dave .------------------------------------------dave.manning@dreamland.unomaha.edu | "There is no other reality dmanning@cwis.unomaha.edu | but our own...." dmanning@synergy.net .-------------------------------------------- dgmanning@aol.com