179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
idm
Date:
Thu, 23 Mar 95 17:44:13 GMT
Subject:
Re: NME discussion
Msg-Id:
<MAPI.Id.0016.00616d65737320204146354530303044@MAPI.to.RFC822>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.SOL.3.91.950323121319.6351A-100000@bingsun1>
Mbox:
idm.9503.gz
quoted 4 lines Hey now...what about Manchester's excellent Jockey Slut mag? They don't> Hey now...what about Manchester's excellent Jockey Slut mag? They don't > really have the best distribution, but they are completely on-the-ball > and cover a nice, varied range of underground dance music. Check it out.... >
Anyone know where I can get this in Birmingham (UK). It must be around somewhere but I've never seen it - only ever come across it referred to in the other mags eg DJ, Mixmag. I dunno, but every dance mag always seems to gravitate towards clubbing (by which I mean the standard house nights which seem to dominate the current magazine listings) and the house end of the music. Generator is the most "techno" mag widely available here, and even they've been erring on getting housier, though one or two letters of complaint have been registered there. Of course its only natural that a mag which relates to "dance" music should include clubbing as a subject, but I'm just hoping that this new publication (Muzik) can keep enough attention away from the mainstream house/handbag/garage side of things and really give the techno, ambient, dub, tripped out and generally less commercial scene a real look in, especially in terms of reviews, and seeking out those clubs where it's not all about ecstasy, dressing up and 125bpm. got that off my chest. later, J ^ __ ___ ___ _ __ __ (__` | (_ /_\ | \ \_/ _ | .__) | (___ / \ |__/ / \_| steady-J@firefox.co.uk