179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: >Old IDM, and the import

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-08-23 00:10Jon Drukman Re: >Old IDM, and the import
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-08-23 00:10Jon DrukmanRE>>Old IDM, and the importance o >I think what Adam, Lazlo, and Jon all pointed out is st
From:
Jon Drukman
To:
IDM
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 1994 17:10:00 PDT
Subject:
Re: >Old IDM, and the import
permalink · <00654.2860420307.1455@opcode.com>
RE>>Old IDM, and the importance o
quoted 2 lines I think what Adam, Lazlo, and Jon all pointed out is still true: AoN, in>I think what Adam, Lazlo, and Jon all pointed out is still true: AoN, in >spite of recent embarrassments (or rather, because of them)
i think that the essay on the Daft CD is accurate: there are really two AoNs: the ZTT label version and the post-ZTT version. The ZTT version really was onto something incredible. The post-ZTT version just regurgitated it in ever weaker doses until the whole thing just self-destructed.
quoted 3 lines Nods in this area should also go to Colourbox, if not just for "Hot>Nods in this area should also go to Colourbox, if not just for "Hot >Doggie" then for "Pump Up the Volume" which probably did more for >house/dance music then anything before or since.
don't forget Edit The Dragon. that one blew my head. lots of their dub stuff is notable from a production standpoint as well. predates the ambient dub craze by ten years or so. /jon