IDM Mailing Archive

1994-07-05 19:14Randy Dudleygotta question: was reading through this month's select and noticed an ad regarding Timesh

From:: Randy Dudley <dudley@phoenix.cs.uga.edu>
To:: Intelligent Dance Music <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 15:14:23 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:: timeshards

gotta question: was reading through this month's select and noticed an ad regarding Timeshard "planet dog's newest signing" whose debut album "Crystal Oscillations" was released the 13th of last month. has anyone had a listen to this? everything else on planet dog is super, should the same be said for this? laters randy

1994-07-06 01:44djkc> > gotta question: > > was reading through this month's select and noticed an ad regardin

From:: djkc <djkc@blkbox.COM>
To:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 20:44:50 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:: Re: timeshards
Reply to:: timeshards

quoted 8 lines gotta question:

> > gotta question: > > was reading through this month's select and noticed an ad regarding Timeshard > "planet dog's newest signing" whose debut album "Crystal Oscillations" was > released the 13th of last month. has anyone had a listen to this? > everything else on planet dog is super, should the same be said for this? >

I don't like this much except for the title track... -djkc

1994-07-05 21:24Christian BartholdssonRandy Dudley writes: >was reading through this month's select and noticed an ad regarding

From:: Christian Bartholdsson <chris@Minsk.DoCS.UU.SE>
To:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Tue, 5 Jul 94 23:24:08 +0200
Subject:: Re: Timeshards

Randy Dudley writes:

quoted 4 lines was reading through this month's select and noticed an ad regarding Timeshard

>was reading through this month's select and noticed an ad regarding Timeshard >"planet dog's newest signing" whose debut album "Crystal Oscillations" was >released the 13th of last month. has anyone had a listen to this? >everything else on planet dog is super, should the same be said for this?

I haven't heard the album, but they were a featured band on MTV's (Europe) 120 Minutes the other week. Their sound was what you could expect from Planet Dog. New age hippy techno in the vein of Eat Static and the likes. Quite good actually. They seemed pretty old, about 35 or so. - chris@minsk.docs.uu.se

1994-07-06 06:50- Greg Earle>>Was reading through this month's Select and noticed an ad regarding Timeshard >>("Planet

From:: - Greg Earle <earle@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US>
To:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Tue, 05 Jul 1994 23:50:29 -0700
Subject:: Re: Timeshards
Reply to:: Re: Timeshards

quoted 9 lines Was reading through this month's Select and noticed an ad regarding Timeshard

>>Was reading through this month's Select and noticed an ad regarding Timeshard >>("Planet Dog's newest signing") whose debut album "Crystal Oscillations" was >>released the 13th of last month. Has anyone had a listen to this? >>Everything else on Planet Dog is super, should the same be said for this? > >I haven't heard the album, but they were a featured band on MTV's (Europe) 120 >Minutes the other week. Their sound was what you could expect from Planet Dog. >New Age Hippy Techno in the vein of Eat Static and the likes. Quite good, >actually. They seemed pretty old, about 35 or so.

"Pretty old"? Grrrrrr ... grrrrrr ... grrrrrr ... (-: It doesn't seem to bother anyone around these parts that Geir J. (Biosphere) is over 30 ... or that Richard H. Kirk is pushing 40 ... or that Steve Hillage is nearly pushing 45 ... How 'bout we stick to the "Quite good"'s and drop the "they seemed pretty old" comments? (Can you guess that I have a different definition of "pretty old" than Chris does? (-: ) Just sign me, - Greg "about 35 or so" Earle P.S. "Not dead yet!"

1994-07-06 01:49808STATE@delphi.comI've tried ordering Timeshards from a couple of sources, but no one seems to have it in st

From:: <808STATE@delphi.com>
To:: <dudley@phoenix.cs.uga.edu>, <IDM@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Tue, 05 Jul 1994 21:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:: Re: timeshards

I've tried ordering Timeshards from a couple of sources, but no one seems to have it in stock yet. 8080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808 8 Paul 0 Namlook 0 0 Rafanello 8 Kirk James 8 8 0 Leiner Fehlmann 0 8 808state@delphi.com 8 Jenssen Rich 8 0 0 Schulze 0 8080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808

1994-07-06 12:31Belinda B. Drake> >I haven't heard the album, but they were a featured band on MTV's (Europe) 120 > >Minut

From:: Belinda B. Drake <bdrake@cabell.vcu.edu>
To:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Wed, 6 Jul 94 8:31:51 EDT
Subject:: Re: Timeshards

quoted 21 lines I haven't heard the album, but they were a featured band on MTV's (Europe) 120

> >I haven't heard the album, but they were a featured band on MTV's (Europe) 120 > >Minutes the other week. Their sound was what you could expect from Planet Dog. > >New Age Hippy Techno in the vein of Eat Static and the likes. Quite good, > >actually. They seemed pretty old, about 35 or so. > > "Pretty old"? Grrrrrr ... grrrrrr ... grrrrrr ... (-: > > It doesn't seem to bother anyone around these parts that Geir J. (Biosphere) is > over 30 ... or that Richard H. Kirk is pushing 40 ... or that Steve Hillage is > nearly pushing 45 ... > > How 'bout we stick to the "Quite good"'s and drop the "they seemed pretty old" > comments? (Can you guess that I have a different definition of "pretty old" > than Chris does? (-: ) > > Just sign me, > > - Greg "about 35 or so" Earle > > P.S. "Not dead yet!" >

I agree wholeheartedly with Greg. But then again, Chris, you already knew that, didn't you? (Whale...?) Age has nothing whatsoever to do with music...please drop it. (oh, ok, so I'm a little sensitive) -bella -- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ bdrake@cabell.vcu.edu / FC 10 8B D4 FE 02 49 FE B7 D0 9D 5F D4 19 8E 88 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ bdrake@cabell.vcu.edu / FC 10 8B D4 FE 02 49 FE B7 D0 9D 5F D4 19 8E 88 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Re: timeshards