179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: Andrew & 808

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-06-06 07:47Andrew & 808
1994-06-07 01:55Re: Andrew & 808
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-06-06 07:47transmat@teleport.comNo flame from me. But compared to Utd. State 90 & Ex:el, Goregous was very weak, about the
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, 5 Jun 1994 23:47:21 -0800
Subject:
Andrew & 808
permalink · <199406060638.XAA29240@teleport.com>
No flame from me. But compared to Utd. State 90 & Ex:el, Goregous was very weak, about the only track I really like is Southern Cross. I dislike all the vocal stuff (although I did like the Bjork tracks on Ex:el, in fact, I wished Massey produced her album, oh well). Time bomb was techno by numbers, and one in ten, stormin norman, sexy synthesizer, real cheezy!!! It's just that I've been listening to them since Newbuild and I expected more. Peace time...space...transmat@teleport.com bleep on!
1994-06-07 01:55808STATE@delphi.com>>But compared to Utd. State 90 & Ex:el, Goregous was very weak, about the only track I re
From:
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 06 Jun 1994 21:55:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: Andrew & 808
permalink · <01HD8JRTQGEQ8WWDC8@delphi.com>
quoted 1 line But compared to Utd. State 90 & Ex:el, Goregous was very weak, about the>>But compared to Utd. State 90 & Ex:el, Goregous was very weak, about the
only track I really like is Southern Cross.<< "Southern Cross" was my favorite track as well. Hopefully that track will point to a new direction for them. 8080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808 0 Paul Rafanello Internet: 808STATE@DELPHI.COM 0 8080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808080808