179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] question

5 messages · 5 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2005-09-26 23:58Eric Re: [idm] question
├─ 2005-09-27 00:06folk devil Re: [idm] question
└─ 2005-09-27 03:49Mark Re: [idm] question
└─ 2005-09-27 03:50Jong-Ilist Massive Re: [idm] question
2005-09-27 01:40kenny ***** Re: [idm] question
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2005-09-26 23:58Eric> From: kenny ***** <kenny****@gmail.com> > > richard james appears to create new genres e
From:
Eric
To:
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:58:30 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] question
permalink · <43388B26.2080501@synthesizer.org>
quoted 6 lines From: kenny ***** <kenny****@gmail.com>> From: kenny ***** <kenny****@gmail.com> > > richard james appears to create new genres everytime he releases > originally, idm was a poor attempt to quantify his now classic works > (which is also the origins of this list) > i wonder if analord will spark a renewed interest in lush compos?
learn your history, or at least read the IDM charter before you talk about what the list quantifies. you sound like the guy who asked if electro was a subgenre of IDM. the only thing analord is going to spark is a bunch of retro mp3s. -e --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2005-09-27 00:06folk devildid I ask that? Are you sure I wasn't being a wee bit sarcastic? > >learn your history, or
From:
folk devil
To:
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:06:59 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] question
Reply to:
Re: [idm] question
permalink · <BAY109-F28740D9F69A7EDF6540AB8ED8A0@phx.gbl>
did I ask that? Are you sure I wasn't being a wee bit sarcastic?
quoted 9 lines learn your history, or at least read the IDM charter before you talk about> >learn your history, or at least read the IDM charter before you talk about >what the list quantifies. you sound like the guy who asked if electro was a >subgenre of IDM. > >the only thing analord is going to spark is a bunch of retro mp3s. > >-e >
_________________________________________________________________ Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2005-09-27 03:49MarkIDM charter????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! that really made me lol On Monday, Septe
From:
Mark
To:
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:49:17 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] question
Reply to:
Re: [idm] question
permalink · <ADD9C9FF-2F09-11DA-9A95-000A95774B94@psilos.net>
IDM charter????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! that really made me lol On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 06:58 PM, Eric wrote:
quoted 20 lines From: kenny ***** <kenny****@gmail.com>>> From: kenny ***** <kenny****@gmail.com> >> >> richard james appears to create new genres everytime he releases >> originally, idm was a poor attempt to quantify his now classic works >> (which is also the origins of this list) >> i wonder if analord will spark a renewed interest in lush compos? > > learn your history, or at least read the IDM charter before you talk > about what the list quantifies. you sound like the guy who asked if > electro was a subgenre of IDM. > > the only thing analord is going to spark is a bunch of retro mp3s. > > -e > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2005-09-27 03:50Jong-Ilist MassiveWE, THE BEEPLES, OF THE UNISON STATES OF POLYPHONY... On 9/26/05, Mark <mark@psilos.net> w
From:
Jong-Ilist Massive
To:
Mark
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:50:05 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] question
Reply to:
Re: [idm] question
permalink · <84c4d14005092620506c1f2b6b@mail.gmail.com>
WE, THE BEEPLES, OF THE UNISON STATES OF POLYPHONY... On 9/26/05, Mark <mark@psilos.net> wrote:
quoted 31 lines IDM charter????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! that really made me> IDM charter????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! that really made me > lol > On Monday, September 26, 2005, at 06:58 PM, Eric wrote: > > >> From: kenny ***** <kenny****@gmail.com> > >> > >> richard james appears to create new genres everytime he releases > >> originally, idm was a poor attempt to quantify his now classic works > >> (which is also the origins of this list) > >> i wonder if analord will spark a renewed interest in lush compos? > > > > learn your history, or at least read the IDM charter before you talk > > about what the list quantifies. you sound like the guy who asked if > > electro was a subgenre of IDM. > > > > the only thing analord is going to spark is a bunch of retro mp3s. > > > > -e > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
-- pete lastname meatsock@gmail.com www.grep-fu.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2005-09-27 01:40kenny *****people have conversations that are more than a series of question asking the discussion wa
From:
kenny *****
To:
Eric , idm list
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:40:29 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] question
permalink · <5a0c9bac05092618405036da78@mail.gmail.com>
people have conversations that are more than a series of question asking the discussion was about genres, perhaps you've been following the wrong thread? here's the link to the IDM page http://music.hyperreal.org/lists/idm/ you might want to read the first sentence i've been around since rdj only had tiny vinyl releases, trying to get my buddies to get em at the uk record stores (they were very hard to get, even back then) i certainly remember when the IDM term first started circulating in the rags and i still maintain that the term idm is a poor description of the music he pioneered but that was the point of the conversation and how the conversation began you haven't insulted me, you just appear confused maybe you should take your own advice? On 9/26/05, Eric <eric@synthesizer.org> wrote:
quoted 11 lines the point was to actually have conversation on the list> > > the point was to actually have conversation on the list > > not an excuse to be a twat > > you must mean your "i wonder..." question. it's the only conversational > part of your post because the bit before that is completely unrelated to > it. i responded to both. > > if you don't think that sparking a retro bedroom producer craze is a > valid reaction to the analords then say so rather than being insulting. >