179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] Now Playing (was Re: [idm] u2 aphex)

11 messages · 9 participants · spans 4 days · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: now playing (was re: [idm] u2 aphex) · u2 aphex
2004-11-23 18:52chthonic streams [idm] u2 aphex
├─ 2004-11-23 18:53sokela Re: [idm] u2 aphex
├─ 2004-11-23 19:29circuit bender Re: [idm] u2 aphex
│ └─ 2004-11-23 19:37Alan Lucas Re: [idm] u2 aphex
│ └─ 2004-11-23 20:29chthonic streams Re: [idm] u2 aphex
│ └─ 2004-11-23 21:48max Re: [idm] u2 aphex
└─ 2004-11-24 08:35Michael Scheer [idm] Re: u2 aphex
2004-11-26 22:35max Re: [idm] u2 aphex
└─ 2004-11-27 14:04n3wjack Re: [idm] u2 aphex
└─ 2004-11-27 14:14theREALmxyzptlk Re: [idm] u2 aphex
2004-11-27 17:33Kurt Bernhard Pruenner [idm] Now Playing (was Re: [idm] u2 aphex)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2004-11-23 18:52chthonic streamsin a bizarre bit of visual coincidence, tell me the graphic behind u2 in the upper right h
From:
chthonic streams
To:
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:52:06 -0500
Subject:
[idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <p05210600bdc9370bb151@[64.63.223.245]>
in a bizarre bit of visual coincidence, tell me the graphic behind u2 in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look like the aphex twin logo! http://flickr.com/photos/u2logcom/1640386/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-23 18:53sokelaIt doesn't. These are just the legs of a woman (obviously on one of those mega-ads you can
From:
sokela
To:
idm@hyperreal.org
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:53:31 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
Reply to:
[idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <41A3872A.8060204@s1998.tu-chemnitz.de>
It doesn't. These are just the legs of a woman (obviously on one of those mega-ads you can find on Broadway). Sok. chthonic streams schrieb:
quoted 12 lines in a bizarre bit of visual coincidence, tell me the graphic behind u2> in a bizarre bit of visual coincidence, tell me the graphic behind u2 > in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look like the aphex > twin logo! > > http://flickr.com/photos/u2logcom/1640386/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-23 19:29circuit bender'the graphic behind u2 in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look like the ap
From:
circuit bender
To:
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:29:59 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
Reply to:
[idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <20041123192959.72647.qmail@web60802.mail.yahoo.com>
'the graphic behind u2 in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look like the aphex twin logo'! ;] chthonic streams <chthonic@chthonicstreams.com> wrote: in a bizarre bit of visual coincidence, tell me the graphic behind u2 in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look like the aphex twin logo! http://flickr.com/photos/u2logcom/1640386/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Discover all that?s new in My Yahoo!
2004-11-23 19:37Alan LucasOn Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:29:59 -0800 (PST), circuit bender <circuit_bender@yahoo.com> wrote:
From:
Alan Lucas
To:
incidental derogatory mnemonics
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:37:41 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
Reply to:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <5e21321c041123113771391bad@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:29:59 -0800 (PST), circuit bender <circuit_bender@yahoo.com> wrote:
quoted 5 lines 'the graphic behind u2 in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look l> 'the graphic behind u2 in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look like the > aphex twin logo'! > ;] > >
yeah, sorry. i have to agree with this, too. you may be looking at those legs and saying "come to daddy," but that's about as close to it being aphex as you're gonna get. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-23 20:29chthonic streams>On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:29:59 -0800 (PST), circuit bender ><circuit_bender@yahoo.com> wrot
From:
chthonic streams
To:
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:29:29 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
Reply to:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <p05210600bdc94d57ef64@[64.63.223.224]>
quoted 12 lines On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:29:59 -0800 (PST), circuit bender>On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:29:59 -0800 (PST), circuit bender ><circuit_bender@yahoo.com> wrote: >> 'the graphic behind u2 in the upper right hand corner of this pic >>doesn't look like the >> aphex twin logo'! >> ;] >> >> > >yeah, sorry. i have to agree with this, too. you may be looking at >those legs and saying "come to daddy," but that's about as close to it >being aphex as you're gonna get.
yes, i know they're actually legs. no, they don't excite me. but if you look at the cover of 'selected ambient works v1', it's the same shape, black on white. yes, it's missing the circle. no, i wasn't saying it actually was the logo. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-23 21:48max>> >> yeah, sorry. i have to agree with this, too. you may be looking at >> those legs and
From:
max
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:48:16 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
Reply to:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <61DDE31D-3D99-11D9-8CA8-000A95854476@cox.net>
quoted 10 lines yeah, sorry. i have to agree with this, too. you may be looking at>> >> yeah, sorry. i have to agree with this, too. you may be looking at >> those legs and saying "come to daddy," but that's about as close to it >> being aphex as you're gonna get. > > yes, i know they're actually legs. no, they don't excite me. but if > you look at the cover of 'selected ambient works v1', it's the same > shape, black on white. yes, it's missing the circle. no, i wasn't > saying it actually was the logo. >
Ok ok you're forgiven chuckle. Have to admit though, that was a quick swipe ('come to daddy') and a good one. ...as well as your noting that the 'legs' looked very Aphex logo-ish; it's nice to look around you in the screwed-up world and find some form of affirmation of the things you enjoy!!! Cheers on your posting of the photo link and keep having fun! np: Aphex Twin--"Xtal" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-24 08:35Michael Scheerchthonic streams <chthonic@chthonicstreams.com> wrote: > in a bizarre bit of visual coinci
From:
Michael Scheer
To:
Date:
Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:35:06 +0100
Subject:
[idm] Re: u2 aphex
Reply to:
[idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <DCqk4YTz@minna.autechre.de>
chthonic streams <chthonic@chthonicstreams.com> wrote:
quoted 3 lines in a bizarre bit of visual coincidence, tell me the graphic behind u2> in a bizarre bit of visual coincidence, tell me the graphic behind u2 > in the upper right hand corner of this pic doesn't look like the > aphex twin logo!
You are absolutely right. RDJ is controlling U2s minds. Top secret! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-26 22:35max>> np: Aphex Twin--"Xtal" >> > hey what does np mean? when you said "np: aphex twin--"Xtal
From:
max
To:
idm list
Date:
Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:35:00 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <689074EA-3FFB-11D9-8748-000A95854476@cox.net>
quoted 5 lines np: Aphex Twin--"Xtal">> np: Aphex Twin--"Xtal" >> > hey what does np mean? when you said "np: aphex twin--"Xtal" ? > >
it means NOW PLAYING. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-27 14:04n3wjackOn Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:35:00 -0600, max <max0666@cox.net> wrote: > >> np: Aphex Twin--"Xta
From:
n3wjack
To:
Date:
Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:04:36 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
Reply to:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <32064722041127060460f3c92b@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:35:00 -0600, max <max0666@cox.net> wrote:
quoted 6 lines np: Aphex Twin--"Xtal"> >> np: Aphex Twin--"Xtal" > >> > > hey what does np mean? when you said "np: aphex twin--"Xtal" ? > > > > it means NOW PLAYING.
is that like a plugin/script, or do you bother putting that kind of stuff in there yourself? -- "progress doesn't come from early risers progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things" http://n3wjack.blogspot.com http://www.jungletrain.net - 24/7 dnb radio station --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-27 14:14theREALmxyzptlkn3wjack wrote: >On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:35:00 -0600, max <max0666@cox.net> wrote: > > >>>>n
From:
theREALmxyzptlk
To:
n3wjack , idm
Date:
Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:14:01 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
Reply to:
Re: [idm] u2 aphex
permalink · <41A88BA9.2030408@comcast.net>
n3wjack wrote:
quoted 20 lines On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:35:00 -0600, max <max0666@cox.net> wrote:>On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:35:00 -0600, max <max0666@cox.net> wrote: > > >>>>np: Aphex Twin--"Xtal" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>hey what does np mean? when you said "np: aphex twin--"Xtal" ? >>> >>> >>> >>it means NOW PLAYING. >> >> > >is that like a plugin/script, or do you bother putting that kind of >stuff in there yourself? > > >
This is a practice in place on many lists from probably the mid 90s. It was a way of giving other people ideas of new records to investigate - like a personal playing list for the present moment. It would seem unlikely that anyone would have a specific record set up as "now playing" in a script unless they were in some kind of listening experiment or strange marathon. jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-11-27 17:33Kurt Bernhard Pruennern3wjack wrote: > is that like a plugin/script, or do you bother putting that kind of > stu
From:
Kurt Bernhard Pruenner
To:
Sounds Made By A Dying DSP
Date:
Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:33:33 +0100
Subject:
[idm] Now Playing (was Re: [idm] u2 aphex)
permalink · <41A8BA6D.54E083E3@njuuus.desdemona.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at>
n3wjack wrote:
quoted 2 lines is that like a plugin/script, or do you bother putting that kind of> is that like a plugin/script, or do you bother putting that kind of > stuff in there yourself?
I'm not max, but I have my Foobar2000's text writer plugin set up to re-write my Netscape's signature every time the song changes; and before I started using Foobar2000 I did it by hand... -- Kurt Bernhard Pruenner --- Haendelstrasse 17 --- 4020 Linz --- Austria .......It might be written "Mindfuck", but it's spelt "L-A-I-N"....... np: Iwasaki Taku - R.O.D (R.O.D The TV Original Soundtrack 1) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org