Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 11:28:32 -0800
To: idm@hyperreal.org
From: "Matthew Korfhage" <pomomofo2000@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [idm] Hefty I.A. #1
Message-ID: <F10IvZr2AAEvoJ4iyIl000078c5@hotmail.com>
From: "Benjamin McDonald" <warpfan@hotmail.com>
quoted 5 lines To squelch some negativity, i will start a silly post:
>To squelch some negativity, i will start a silly post:
>Anyone besides me think that the suggested speed of this record is >wrong?
>It sounds SO good at 33, and SO hurried at 45. Perhaps I think >that this
>project is more downbeat than it is.
>benine
You know, I thought the same exact thing, and now play the record
exclusively at 33. The 45 speed didn't sound entirely out of line with the
note range that herren was working with on Folk Songs, though, IMO. At any
rate, whoever buys the forthcoming CD comp of the IA series should know that
they'll be missing something very beautiful if it's burned at the faster
speed. I'll be interested to hear which way it plays.
Cheers,
M.
You know what i think it is that lends to this (cause i know it isnt right,
the voice on the A side is obviously correct at 45). I think that the rythum
tracks are closest to real time at 33 than at 45. He supposedly does all
sorts of lofi tricks on his tracks, and I bet that his is one of them. Lets
pettition John Hughes to put the tracks at 33 on the comp!
And another proper speed question: While's MAS 12"? Anyone have any clue on
this one? both speeds seem proper.
benine
benine
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org