179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] Akai S1000, s2000, Akai s*

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2000-09-22 13:31ian Re: [idm] Akai S1000, s2000, Akai s*
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-09-22 13:31ian---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "daniel lee" <daniell
From:
ian
To:
, daniel lee
Date:
Fri, 22 Sep 100 13:31:19 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Akai S1000, s2000, Akai s*
permalink · <200009221331443.SM00124@webice.net>
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "daniel lee" <daniellee@trashaesthetics.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 18:44:07 +0100
quoted 9 lines Well yes the dynamic range and signal to noise is inferior to s2000 but>Well yes the dynamic range and signal to noise is inferior to s2000 but >seeing as Akai's are so poor in respect to fidelity compared to EMU's it is >all academic. I've been told the filters and time stretch sound better in >the way they degrade and colour the sound. But that could just be one of >those stories people make up without justifying. Anyway the S2000 has that >horrid 2x16 LCD doesn't it? And MIDI transfers how can you put up with >that. I'd love an S1000PB. >They are selling s2000's where i work for ?350 with full RAM but i wouldn't >get one.
Ah,. come one now, I'll give you that Akais arent the best, but has this whole thread jst slammed on them? I love my S3000, id take a 2000 too. they do the trick. the effects processor is actually quite nice, at least in the 3000, btw... fuck needing huge LCDs or LEDs :P its more 31337 to punch all your shit on a small screen anyway, hitting all kinds of buttons to switch between options :> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org