179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) klunko

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-12-06 22:16Re: (idm) klunko
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-12-06 22:16NonalignmentPact@aol.comIn a message dated 12/6/99 9:50:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, stained@the-wire.com writes:
From:
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 17:16:08 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) klunko
permalink · <0.61bf8aa2.257d8fa8@aol.com>
In a message dated 12/6/99 9:50:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, stained@the-wire.com writes: << And as for stuff that I'm assigned to review for the mags I write for - if I don't like it personally, I make every attempt to find *something* in the music that I could see appealing to a listener. >> the problem with this approach is reviews are meant to be objective, not subjective. if you can see what people would like in it, point it out, but if it truly doesn't appeal to you, not stating that IS asskissing. Mr Asshole --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org