179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) flanger

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 33 days · search this subject
1999-06-04 02:43~\(\({\[Endemic~Distortion\]}\)\)~ (idm) Flanger
1999-07-06 22:59Arthur Purvis (idm) flanger
└─ 1999-07-06 23:21Andrew Hime Re: (idm) flanger
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-06-04 02:43~\(\({\[Endemic~Distortion\]}\)\)~Got my Flanger in the post today (Thanks Ninjas!!) Think 70s fusion jazz. Think digital ma
From:
~\(\({\[Endemic~Distortion\]}\)\)~
To:
It'ssupposedtosounDlikethat,moM
Cc:
Uwe and Friends
Date:
Thu, 03 Jun 1999 19:43:18 -0700
Subject:
(idm) Flanger
permalink · <37573D46.ACD8F259@flash.net>
Got my Flanger in the post today (Thanks Ninjas!!) Think 70s fusion jazz. Think digital madness, incredibly tight/precise programming. Think cheesy chunks (good cheese). Even think a spot of dub. NOW think of the way Senor Coconut seemed to move between its faux Latin to cheese to digital mania sporadically...sometimes seamlessly (e.g., that incredible Fx-ed snare drum roll) so you'd find yourself "somewhere else" if you turned your head for a minute and sometimes like falling off a cliff. Very acoustic sounding drums interspersed with digitalia. Prominent fender-rhodes sounds and lifelike (sometimes) bass. Neither Bernd nor Uwe sound out-of-sorts at all....NUF gets jazzy at times, and, well, what DOESN'T Atom Heart do? It seems to me like Uwe's influence is the most predominant, but maybe it's because he's really identifiable. I like this record. Fun, flashy and done with the high sense of humor we've come to expect (yet with great respect to what they cop and great skill to boot) from these guys. Again, thanks to the Ninjas for generosity - and with a bit of a break in form which this release is (btw, I'm pro-ninjatune). jeff -- jeff "10,000 people all screaming the same thing at the same time are wrong, even if they're right." dancing/about/architecture "...with wandering steps and slow..." ICQ904008
1999-07-06 22:59Arthur Purvis>WHY I DIDN'T LIKE THE DAMN FLANGER RECORD That could've been stated more simply as "this
From:
Arthur Purvis
To:
Date:
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
(idm) flanger
permalink · <Pine.GSO.4.03.9907061858420.19729-100000@sunlab2.Princeton.EDU>
quoted 1 line WHY I DIDN'T LIKE THE DAMN FLANGER RECORD>WHY I DIDN'T LIKE THE DAMN FLANGER RECORD
That could've been stated more simply as "this is a piss poor record." Except for track 6 or so, full on scientist or something that I kinda liked. The rest is intensely dull. --- the humble abbott arthur purvis set his hand hereto
1999-07-06 23:21Andrew Hime> >WHY I DIDN'T LIKE THE DAMN FLANGER RECORD > > That could've been stated more simply as
From:
Andrew Hime
To:
Date:
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:21:37 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) flanger
Reply to:
(idm) flanger
permalink · <199907062321.SAA13005@kali.wf.net>
quoted 6 lines WHY I DIDN'T LIKE THE DAMN FLANGER RECORD> >WHY I DIDN'T LIKE THE DAMN FLANGER RECORD > > That could've been stated more simply as "this is a piss poor record." > > Except for track 6 or so, full on scientist or something that I kinda > liked. The rest is intensely dull.
Guess I don't need to do a review now. Hate to bite that hand that fed me a promo, but this was a pretty dull record. I'm going to try listening to it again, but I don't expect to get much out of it.