179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!

10 messages · 7 participants · spans 4 days · search this subject
1999-03-04 20:51Dr. Smith Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-05 00:08Tomas Jirku Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-05 02:15Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-05 06:27Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
└─ 1999-03-05 10:29szalemandre Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-05 15:37Dr. Smith Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-05 20:54Che Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-07 02:11Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-07 04:39AndrewC. Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
1999-03-08 18:23david turgeon Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-04 20:51Dr. SmithMobileWann@aol.com wrote: > you are saying that they don't have a style, I think that is r
From:
Dr. Smith
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 04 Mar 1999 21:51:41 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <36DEF25D.9E6CCB4@calvin.edu>
MobileWann@aol.com wrote:
quoted 6 lines you are saying that they don't have a style, I think that is rather silly.> you are saying that they don't have a style, I think that is rather silly. > Listen to several differen ae tracks, do you really believe you cannot find > the affinity between them? If you ask me I will tell you that Ae have a very > poinient style,.. much of their familiarity comes from their melodies, which > personally I find to envoke very vivid emotions, the rest of their style I > suppose I would attribute to the sounds they use and how they use them.
I agree that the sounds play an important role, but I believe it has more to do with the track construction itself. The sounds Ae have used have varied tremendously over the years, for instance on "incunabula" the now cliche TR-808 ("Ye Olde Analogue Drumme Machine") makes several appearances. Now a days, Ae have moved on, and I'm sure their 808 is gathering dust in the corner, and yet, Autechre still sounds like Autechre. With my sampler, I can create "Ae-like" sounds, but I have never been able to forge an "Ae-like" track. Their combination of timing, juxtaposition techniques, a sense of simplicity, and complex sounds is totally unique, and is what truly set Ae apart. Autechre makes music that is to be listened to... deeply. Is it just me, or am I the only one who cannot do anything but listen when I hear an Ae track? Their music requires your full attention, otherwise it often sounds, to quote my floor mates, like "a bunch of weird noise." I don't blame other artists for trying to "sound like Autechre", after all, they're only trying to sound like the best. Three cheers for the kings. -Andrew -- Propecia: Are you taking enough? http://www.calvin.edu/~asmith89/
1999-03-05 00:08Tomas Jirku>created. My point being is although Autechre were the pioneers of this >"type" or "sound"
From:
Tomas Jirku
To:
Date:
Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:08:57 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <36DF2099.6E2D@yirku.com>
quoted 3 lines created. My point being is although Autechre were the pioneers of this>created. My point being is although Autechre were the pioneers of this >"type" or "sound" of music the artist who follow are not necessarily >Autechre clones.
IM(very)HO: i agree that they are not autechre clones, but only for a completely different reason: if in fact these musicians are attempting to rip-off autechre's style (which i feel they are) they are failing miserably. autechre does not have a "style", but rather each of their songs unique and what these clones are responding to is the supposed "cruchy-beat" sound that we have all seen mentioned in reviews far too often. autechre never repeat themselves, so for any other musician to do the same is to entirely misunderstand autechre. [yes, i am their biggest fan. why do you ask?]
quoted 4 lines The Autechre sound is now part of a large list of> The Autechre sound is now part of a large list of >sub-category's under the term "IDM". In my opinion Autechre have been >breaking new ground with every release which opens the door to new >artist putting a new twist to this sub-category of IDM.
this categorization mentality must be stopped; it is what breeds these clones. tomas
1999-03-05 02:15MobileWann@aol.comIn a message dated 3/4/99 5:11:24 PM Mountain Standard Time, tomas@yirku.com writes: > i a
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:15:25 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <14543d01.36df3e3d@aol.com>
In a message dated 3/4/99 5:11:24 PM Mountain Standard Time, tomas@yirku.com writes:
quoted 9 lines i agree that they are not autechre clones, but only for a completely> i agree that they are not autechre clones, but only for a completely > different reason: if in fact these musicians are attempting to rip-off > autechre's style (which i feel they are) they are failing miserably. > autechre does not have a "style", but rather each of their songs unique > and what these clones are responding to is the supposed "cruchy-beat" > sound that we have all seen mentioned in reviews far too often. autechre > never repeat themselves, so for any other musician to do the same is to > entirely misunderstand autechre. > [yes, i am their biggest fan. why do you ask?]
you are saying that they don't have a style, I think that is rather silly. Listen to several differen ae tracks, do you really believe you cannot find the affinity between them? If you ask me I will tell you that Ae have a very poinient style,.. much of their familiarity comes from their melodies, which personally I find to envoke very vivid emotions, the rest of their style I suppose I would attribute to the sounds they use and how they use them. ~crtrdge
1999-03-05 06:27MobileWann@aol.comIn a message dated 3/4/99 7:42:11 PM Mountain Standard Time, asmith89@calvin.edu writes: >
From:
To:
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 01:27:32 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <f42c3d97.36df7954@aol.com>
In a message dated 3/4/99 7:42:11 PM Mountain Standard Time, asmith89@calvin.edu writes:
quoted 3 lines Their> Their > combination of timing, juxtaposition techniques, a sense of simplicity, and > complex sounds is totally unique, and is what truly set Ae apart.
basically what you're saying is that they're good musicians. and that is what seperates "IDM" from all that other mediochre to complete crap electronic music out there... Musicianship. and THAT IM(not so)HO is the one and only deciding factor in whether or not electronic music is IDM. Are they real musicians? or are they just kids playing with techno toys.. ~crtrdge
1999-03-05 10:29szalemandre> > Their > > combination of timing, juxtaposition techniques, a sense of simplicity, and
From:
szalemandre
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 05:29:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <Pine.LNX.3.96.990305052010.360N-100000@juggler>
quoted 9 lines Their> > Their > > combination of timing, juxtaposition techniques, a sense of simplicity, and > > complex sounds is totally unique, and is what truly set Ae apart. > > basically what you're saying is that they're good musicians. and that is what > seperates "IDM" from all that other mediochre to complete crap electronic > music out there... Musicianship. and THAT IM(not so)HO is the one and only > deciding factor in whether or not electronic music is IDM. Are they real > musicians? or are they just kids playing with techno toys..
(even though this wasn't a response to my post) you could use your statements right there to sum up what i was trying to say earlier. (that if you're not speaking with your own voice, then shut the fuck up.) that's basically it. of course there will be people who just puke out what they digest. but so what? i don't have to list to, respect or care about them. just more crap to wade through. and here's a perfect example of someone doing something not-so-new, but doing it excellently: muziq. he's secretly wanted to be aphex twin for a long time, then he went pure dnb. but i think as far as kinda straight-ahead dnb goes, his most recent work was probably the best of the bunch. (dnb mind you) it's not so new, not so fresh, but it's excellently done. that's all it takes: just be excellent. :) same goes for vulva. their sound wasn't so new, but they did it excellently. but when Buck McSmith gets a lot of groovegear for christmas and heard a couple gescom tracks and says "i can do that!", so what? he can't do it as well, so why bother? (here's one thing everyone should remember on this list: that everything everyone says on here is their opinion. we shouldn't ever have to actually explicitly state IMHO or anything like that. it should be understood. (including this)) whatever. --- eric sherman szale@doubtful.com doubtful productions www.doubtful.com
1999-03-05 15:37Dr. SmithChe wrote: > At 09:51 PM 3/4/99 +0100, Dr. Smith wrote: > > > I agree that the sounds play
From:
Dr. Smith
To:
Che
Cc:
Intelligent Dumb Music
Date:
Fri, 05 Mar 1999 16:37:16 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <36DFFA2C.A65F7AE4@calvin.edu>
Che wrote:
quoted 11 lines At 09:51 PM 3/4/99 +0100, Dr. Smith wrote:> At 09:51 PM 3/4/99 +0100, Dr. Smith wrote: > > > I agree that the sounds play an important role, but I believe it has > more to >do with the track construction itself. The sounds Ae have used > have varied >tremendously over the years, for instance on "incunabula" the > now cliche TR-808 >("Ye Olde Analogue Drumme Machine") makes several > appearances. Now a days, Ae >have moved on, and I'm sure their 808 is > gathering dust in the corner, and yet, > > That was an R8 w/ (I think) the Dance/Rap card. Not very analogue. A real > 808 sounds much livelier,
Yeah, you're right, someone else mentioned that too. Doh.
quoted 1 line and is never cliched.> and is never cliched.
Hmmm, I can't agree with that one. Ever play with ReBirth? -Andrew -- Propecia: Are you taking enough? http://www.calvin.edu/~asmith89/
1999-03-05 20:54CheAt 09:51 PM 3/4/99 +0100, Dr. Smith wrote: > I agree that the sounds play an important rol
From:
Che
To:
Intelligent Dumb Music
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 12:54:07 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <Pine.BSF.3.96.990305125301.5444A-100000@beacon.synthcom.com>
At 09:51 PM 3/4/99 +0100, Dr. Smith wrote:
quoted 1 line I agree that the sounds play an important role, but I believe it has> I agree that the sounds play an important role, but I believe it has
more to >do with the track construction itself. The sounds Ae have used have varied >tremendously over the years, for instance on "incunabula" the now cliche TR-808 >("Ye Olde Analogue Drumme Machine") makes several appearances. Now a days, Ae >have moved on, and I'm sure their 808 is gathering dust in the corner, and yet, That was an R8 w/ (I think) the Dance/Rap card. Not very analogue. A real 808 sounds much livelier, and is never cliched. Che There's nothing that'll make me reach for the MUTE button faster than a Philips commercial...except Alannis Morrisette.
1999-03-07 02:11MobileWann@aol.comIn a message dated 3/5/99 8:36:50 AM Mountain Standard Time, eerie@mnemonic.net writes: >
From:
To:
Date:
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 21:11:06 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <a2f8cd08.36e1e03a@aol.com>
In a message dated 3/5/99 8:36:50 AM Mountain Standard Time, eerie@mnemonic.net writes:
quoted 2 lines i don't think that's quite it. a "real musician" could do the most> i don't think that's quite it. a "real musician" could do the most > conventional stupid dance music track,
technically he could, yes, but you would not find a good musician wasting his talent... that would go against him being a good muscian.
quoted 2 lines & a kid playing with techno toys> & a kid playing with techno toys > could end up making actual "idm".
Maybe you would call it IDM but I sure as well wouldn't.. nobody without talent can make good music, and that's what you're saying here.. that a person without talent could create something talented.. and that is ridiculous.. unless of course your definition of IDM is different than mine. and you know what.. I think it is.
quoted 3 lines i think the original idea behind idm was to give an alternative to the> > i think the original idea behind idm was to give an alternative to the > repetitive, unoriginal beats which then dominated techno music.
Your saying that the originators of this widespread genre we know as IDM were inspired to create something new because they were bored with the unoriginal beats of the time. I don't believe that at all.. IDM is something that has existed ever since Kraftwerk. IDM is good electronic music, as oppossed to shitty electronic music. what makes it good is that musicianship, originality, creativity, skillfulness, insite, romantisism all the same ingrediants that have made good musicians since the beginning of music..That is really all there is to say about it. Artists such as aphex twin got the ball rolling faster in the small area of people creating IDM. Your definition is of IDM is far different than mine, and I don't quite care for yours, I think it's rather shallow, and extremely unromantic. Look at the term itself.. intelligent dance music, as opposed to stupid dance music.. that's all it means.. this is good.. and that other stuff is shit. ~crtrdge
1999-03-07 04:39AndrewC.>technically he could, yes, but you would not find a good musician wasting his >talent...
From:
AndrewC.
To:
Date:
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 23:39:11 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <002001be6854$72fa4b20$9f995ed1@slothrop>
quoted 1 line technically he could, yes, but you would not find a good musician wasting>technically he could, yes, but you would not find a good musician wasting
his
quoted 1 line talent... that would go against him being a good muscian.>talent... that would go against him being a good muscian.
Ho ho - you should be in a TV movie. "Stop wasting your talent on that Rock & Roll music. You know you've got brains, what about Mozart, and Beethoven?" "But Momma, I love Rock & Roll, I've got to try and be a... a Star!"
quoted 4 lines i think the original idea behind idm was to give an alternative to the>> i think the original idea behind idm was to give an alternative to the >> repetitive, unoriginal beats which then dominated techno music. > >Your saying that the originators of this widespread genre we know as IDM
were
quoted 1 line inspired to create something new because they were bored with the>inspired to create something new because they were bored with the
unoriginal
quoted 1 line beats of the time. I don't believe that at all..>beats of the time. I don't believe that at all..
Well you're wrong. Ninety percent of IDM pioneers were into original house, techno, acid, and hip hop. And I'll bet you a lot of them still like those original beats, and like the man said, they were unimpressed with newer stuff coming out that failed to innovate the original formulas.
quoted 2 lines .. intelligent dance>.. intelligent dance >music, as opposed to stupid dance music.. that's all it means.. this is
good..
quoted 1 line and that other stuff is shit.>and that other stuff is shit.
What a load of old rubbish. Intelligent Dance music is a chimera, a shadow. Your pathetic definition - music that is not "stupid" - tells us nothing apart from what music you don't like. All this appalling Keep Music Live rubbish about skillfullness, and musicianship, its bullshit. Go back to listening to Yngwie J. Malmsteen, where you belong. I'm sure you'll find some wonderfull skill and musicianship in his light speed fret manipulation. Your stupid dance music has in many cases a lot more musicianship than IDM. What does Pole have to do with music? Its all clicks, pops and the occasional half formed melody. Now I love Pole, I love v/vm with their maxi sampled collage vibe, but lets face it, Roy Ayers, or Global Communication to pick two names out of the hat, one a jazz/soul musician with (gasp) vocals, and the other currently making the most divine house music you'll never hear with your ideas of electronic music; both of these have more tunes in their little fingers than most IDM I've heard recently (BoC excluded). They display all the qualities you describe above, but thats not all of why I like them, I like the groove, the funk, the stupid stuff about them. You are confused, little man, and you are a snob. Come clean, and admit it. The music you so loftily define as intelligent is simply Your Favourite Tunes. Stop pretending its innately superior to the stuff you're not into. CheerioAndrewC.
1999-03-08 18:23david turgeonMobileWann@aol.com wrote: > > i don't think that's quite it. a "real musician" could do th
From:
david turgeon
To:
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 08 Mar 1999 13:23:17 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Autechre "clones" or not!
permalink · <36E41595.CB6A9CBE@mnemonic.net>
MobileWann@aol.com wrote:
quoted 4 lines i don't think that's quite it. a "real musician" could do the most> > i don't think that's quite it. a "real musician" could do the most > > conventional stupid dance music track, > technically he could, yes, but you would not find a good musician wasting his > talent... that would go against him being a good muscian.
that's a little optimistic, don't you think? :) i've heard many good musicians in any musical genre make music that was plain boring. also, by "talent", what do we mean? "technical" talent (i.e. knowing how to "play well") isn't as crucial in electronic music, where most of the music is pre-programmed, thus the talent that is usually most needed is instead compositional. & well, you could find a technically perfect track which would be totally plain boom-boom techno--& alternately you could find a flawed track which would fit the "idm" definition.
quoted 7 lines & a kid playing with techno toys> > & a kid playing with techno toys > > could end up making actual "idm". > Maybe you would call it IDM but I sure as well wouldn't.. nobody without > talent can make good music, and that's what you're saying here.. that a person > without talent could create something talented.. and that is ridiculous.. > unless of course your definition of IDM is different than mine. and you know > what.. I think it is.
music cannot be "talented". you can guess from hearing a good track that the person(s) who made it must be talented, but that's as far as you can go unless you're familiar with how exactly they do compose & play their music. hence a completely randomly generated track could theorically sound brilliant although it was made the dumbest way. then again, that's an extreme example, but you only need one rebuttal to break a theory, right? :)
quoted 9 lines i think the original idea behind idm was to give an alternative to the> > i think the original idea behind idm was to give an alternative to the > > repetitive, unoriginal beats which then dominated techno music. > Your saying that the originators of this widespread genre we know as IDM were > inspired to create something new because they were bored with the unoriginal > beats of the time. I don't believe that at all.. IDM is something that has > existed ever since Kraftwerk. IDM is good electronic music, as oppossed to > shitty electronic music. what makes it good is that musicianship, originality, > creativity, skillfulness, insite, romantisism all the same ingrediants that > have made good musicians since the beginning of music..That is really all
well. kraftwerk for one were never categorized as "idm" before the 90s, which for all i know is long after they made their most influential work. i don't want to be picky on genre boundaries & stuff, but when i hear of "idm" i think of a relatively recent movement, even though it has its roots in earlier forms of electronic music. but, that said, we're more or less saying the same thing. even if we consider idm to be whatever intelligent electronic music that was ever made, you'll still have to acknowledge that it had enough of an influence on the other forms of electronic music that nowadays you can't draw a line that dramatically separates idm & non-idm techno. gabber hardcore can be intelligent, acid house can be intelligent... (& some idm may be plain out stupid... theorically of course!)
quoted 6 lines there is to say about it. Artists such as aphex twin got the ball rolling> there is to say about it. Artists such as aphex twin got the ball rolling > faster in the small area of people creating IDM. Your definition is of IDM is > far different than mine, and I don't quite care for yours, I think it's rather > shallow, and extremely unromantic. Look at the term itself.. intelligent dance > music, as opposed to stupid dance music.. that's all it means.. this is good.. > and that other stuff is shit.
ahhh, who needs romanticism when intelligence is at stake. :) -- david turgeon curator, http://www.notype.com web programmer, http://www.jumpmedia.com eerie@mnemonic.net - icq #2358960