yeah, that's approximately why i was saying it should be a private thread.
but i think if they choose to make it public, obviously they are looking for
people to take sides. maybe ken figured that if he got enough plaid-fan
support on his side, plaid/warp would can the compilation.
quoted 1 line But Peter, that is what I said in my Original post. Or your comments are
> But Peter, that is what I said in my Original post. Or your comments are
a
quoted 39 lines reasonable Facsimile thereof....
> reasonable Facsimile thereof....
>
> No Springer, No TV!
>
> Yes, Hk!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Becker [mailto:peterb@ixpres.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 10:47 AM
> To: idm@hyperreal.org
> Subject: [idm] the Plaid/BD thing
>
>
> I wonder when I read these posts concerning very personal squabbles
> between bands ( who are the first to blame for dirty laundering in
> public)
> do any of you folks have lives of your own?
>
> With exception to the posters who claim to be "friends of so and so",
> why are we going over this shit? Do you really feel part of this
> debate if you have no personal connection to these groups? Why are we
> picking sides in a debate that most of us * have no say in at all*?
> Are the opinions of some random individual going to change Plaid/
> Ken's personal debate?
>
> You could watch the Jerry Springer show instead; its almost as mundane.
>
> obidm: that Zammuto disc is lovely
>
> Peter
> np: Red House Painters- Down Colorful Hill
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>