179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) nothing important

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-11-24 20:25matt lee (idm) nothing important
└─ 1998-11-25 11:56-nick^w- Re: (idm) nothing important
1998-11-25 05:09Re: (idm) nothing important
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-11-24 20:25matt leejust some thoughts on a couple (fairly) recent releases: is it just me, or is ska010that t
From:
matt lee
To:
Date:
Tue, 24 Nov 1998 20:25:01 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
Subject:
(idm) nothing important
permalink · <Pine.WNT.4.04.9811242021590.-109865@phase>
just some thoughts on a couple (fairly) recent releases: is it just me, or is ska010that the best skam release since freeform? while recently i've been enjoying some weird stuff like lithops and atom heart, i keep coming back for more of the newest gescom. i think it's the tight beats on the gescom and dc duo's rmxs that do it for me. sometimes i wish that certain artists would just drop some dope beats on our arses, instead of wasting our time with under- developed ideas. speaking of lithops, what's up with the CD version of uni umit? the damn thing is mastered at the wrong speed! as much as i hate to bring up 33 vs. 45 again, this is really bugging me. i try to tolerate personal preferences, but uni umit at 33 just doesn't add up. and speaking of atom heart, here is a classic post from the IDM archives (which i now have on CD :) ----------
1998-11-25 11:56-nick^w-> speaking of lithops, what's up with the CD version of uni > umit? the damn thing is mast
From:
-nick^w-
To:
Date:
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 11:56:35 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) nothing important
Reply to:
(idm) nothing important
permalink · <8A8BE70D31@fs2.scg.man.ac.uk>
quoted 5 lines speaking of lithops, what's up with the CD version of uni> speaking of lithops, what's up with the CD version of uni > umit? the damn thing is mastered at the wrong speed! as > much as i hate to bring up 33 vs. 45 again, this is really > bugging me. i try to tolerate personal preferences, but > uni umit at 33 just doesn't add up.
I'm pretty certain that it should be played at 33 (just compare the sound with 'instrumentals' which is also 33). Nick
1998-11-25 05:09MilkAlive@aol.comIn a message dated 11/25/98 2:31:38 AM GMT Standard Time, mlee@microlink.net writes: << sp
From:
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 00:09:58 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) nothing important
permalink · <aea24973.365b9126@aol.com>
In a message dated 11/25/98 2:31:38 AM GMT Standard Time, mlee@microlink.net writes: << speaking of lithops, what's up with the CD version of uni umit? the damn thing is mastered at the wrong speed! as much as i hate to bring up 33 vs. 45 again, this is really bugging me. i try to tolerate personal preferences, but uni umit at 33 just doesn't >> what, pray tell, made you think that uni umit is meant to be played at 45? there's certainly no indication anywhere on the vinyl packaging, and played at 33, it sounds right in line with all of the other recent jan st. werner records......