179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) ny times article

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2000-03-30 04:25Brock @ Motormouthmedia (idm) ny times article
2000-03-31 10:29alex_tea Re: (idm) ny times article
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-03-30 04:25Brock @ Motormouthmedia-----Original Message----- From: hans kaufmann [mailto:Hansolo_sf@excite.com] Sent: Wednes
From:
Brock @ Motormouthmedia
To:
idm
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:25:12 +0800
Subject:
(idm) ny times article
permalink · <0FS900F5S4P186@mta1.snfc21.pbi.net>
-----Original Message----- From: hans kaufmann [mailto:Hansolo_sf@excite.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 2:25 PM To: Diana Potts; johbus@allmusic.com; idm@hyperreal.org; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) NY Times Electronic Article It's almost annoying to see so many posts on a lame ass NY Times article. We all have noticed how utterly retarted the "Rave" scene has become (or always was in my opinion). But Techno (and all ther sub-genres because I refuse to use that god forsaken Electronica word) in general is now an officially established ass sucking mainstream phenomenom and it has been progressing that way for years. And if you'll take a short look back into history you'll see what occurs whenever any music based "Scene" become a mainstream chunk of popular culture (punk, Disco, even late 80's Hair metal). YOU GET SHIT AND IT DIES OFF INTO OBSCURITY! The desperation and the heart are lost from the music and all the bandwagon hoppers make it annoying for the "old schoolers" to go out to hear what they love. Money and record labels have forced it's way into it and it's impossible for any of us to go see if say Jeff Mills still has it or if he sucks now (I'm curious) but his goddamn fees are too much, so I doubt I'll ever know. Who the fuck cares if so and so get's the recognition they deserve, they are artists and the fact that there is this list devoted to knowing what color every Detroit Dj's shoe's were at such and such show should let you know that they get true recognition from those who know. FUCK the Mainstream Media-it's all lies anyway. Fuck the suck ass Dj's and Producer's who get huge off a name or a cheesy MTV track (or showing some tit like DJ Rap). I'm gettin annoyed as fuck by hearing a shitty jungle track on every car commercial or Pantene Pro V's House tracks. But hey it's ultra popular and the quality is dying for the sake of quantity and you'll keep gettin more and more nostalgic. I could go on bitching forever but won't cause I have to work. So in Closing Fuck the New York Times. Instead of bitching on this list why don't we go write the truth and spread it. Otherwise just sit back and watch it all suck worse and worse until you wake up one day telling you kids what is was like to be a Raver in the 90's (like your friends Hippy mom did about the 60's) Hans <snip> I'm sure I'm not the first to weigh in on this one, but I had to reply to the mail below and all the other denouncements of the Times piece - I really don't understand why you're so bitterly opposed to this one, beyond a simple knee-jerk reaction to the NY Times name and the commercial/mainstream implications it carries. Aside from all that, I know the writer (Bill Werde, also works at CMJ) and he's one of most well-versed journalists out there as far as electronic music goes and wrote the piece with nothing but good intentions in mind. He's one of the "old-schoolers" you mention, not some mainstream moron who just hopped on last week's electronica bandwagon! It's *intended* to be a very basic intro - that's why some of the artists spotlighted are people like Basement Jaxx and Plastikman, whose CD's might actually be available in your average record store, as opposed to some of the more obscure artists that perhaps you'd prefer to be mentioned. Not exactly sure what would've made you happy, but the piece works for the publication it was written for - and with any luck it'll turn some people on to new forms of music they might not have previously been exposed to. That's the first step in making this whole scene solvent, so that labels and artists and mags can actually make enough money to subsidize their own interests and expose the music we all love to a larger audience. Sorry, just get frustrated at these elitist outbursts that don't seem to do anything other than create more static and negativity on this list and within the scene as a whole. Do something positive for a change...Brock ______________ Brock Phillips Motormouthmedia 2525 Hyperion Ave. Suite One Los Angeles, CA 90027 fon 323.662.3865 fax 323.662.3844
2000-03-31 10:29alex_teayou know what they say about the new york times and bandwagon jumping tho don't you... loo
From:
alex_tea
To:
idm
Date:
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:29:17 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) ny times article
permalink · <018401bf9afb$f84c9320$b36efea9@fatcat3>
you know what they say about the new york times and bandwagon jumping tho don't you... looks like they've signalled the end of idm... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org