179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

RE: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases

9 messages · 9 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 4 subjects: (idm) .rambling. thoughts on recent idm purchases · (idm) classic detroit releases · (idm) idm's roots · (idm) thoughts on recent idm purchases
2000-03-29 14:26shep. (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
2000-03-30 05:16Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
└─ 2000-03-30 06:12brucelev Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
├─ 2000-03-30 06:24Lance @ Inaudible Re: (idm) Classic Detroit releases
├─ 2000-03-30 06:34Douglas Smith Re: (idm) IDM's Roots
└─ 2000-03-30 13:57John Bush RE: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
2000-03-30 13:22Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
2000-03-30 14:28Ross Balmer Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
└─ 2000-03-30 14:53Gil Re: (idm) .rambling. Thoughts on recent idm purchases
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-03-29 14:26shep.I traded in some old cds I wasn't listening to, and went on a major idm benge up in Berkel
From:
shep.
Cc:
idm , influx
Date:
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 06:26:05 -0800
Subject:
(idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <B507527D.32DE%shephrdNOSPAM@earthlink.net>
I traded in some old cds I wasn't listening to, and went on a major idm benge up in Berkeley yesterday. Thanks to everyone on the rma newsgroup and idm list for the recommendations. I'm happy with everything I picked up, but I listed these in order from favorite to least favorite to possibly stir up some friendly debate =) On CD: 1. Arovane "Atol Scrap" 2. Schematic Compilation "Lily of the Valley" 3. Solvent "Solvently One Listens" 4. Ko-Wrecktechnique "Ko-Wrecktion" 5. While "Lock" 6. Mira Calix "One on One" 7. Push Button Objects "Dirty Dozen" On Vinyl: 1. Autechre Envane (Both 12"s) 2. Autechre ep7 (Both 12"s) 3. Michael Fakesch "Marion" I can't believe all of this great idm that's been coming out lately. When the older, jaded idm'ers say that all the new idm sucks, I wonder if they've heard any of this stuff. Arovane and the Schematic comp are my absolute favorites followed closely by Ko-Wrecktechnique, Fakesch, and Solvent which are all really great too. While is also good, but not quite as good as Arovane. Mira Calix and Push Button Objects are still growing on me. My being slightly underwhelmed by PBO is surprising to me since I loved their collaberation with DJ Craze on Ko-Wrecktechnique. I love minimal stuff like Panasonic and Consumed, but some of the tracks on Dirty Dozen seem to be missing some melody or rhythmic variation. Something. Michael Fakesch's "Marion" seems to have the perfect balance of melodic minimalism. Fakesch gets it just right for my tastes. Perhaps I'm just spoiled by the hyper-melodic styles of Arovane, Solvent, and the Schematic comp right now. Anyway, I think I'll grow to love PBO and Calix in time. Someone said that Calix was their favorite idm release of the year, but my vote goes to Arovane or the Schematic Comp for best idm of 2000 so far. Fakesch will probably make my top ten list this year, but who knows if more idm of this quality keeps coming out. Don't get me wrong. Solvent was awesome, but I think it came out in 1999. Definitely one of my favorites though. Also, I looked for, but wasn't able to find the following: Mille Plateaux: Clicks and Cuts 2CD comp hia & biosphere: birmingham frequencies L'usine: the s/t release on Isophlux Please tell me if you know where I can get these online. Thanks! -- S H A D O W D W E L L E R S clever mc-noahdeeakili-jamal amin-shep P S A L M 9 1 [remove "NOSPAM" to reply] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 05:16AeOtaku@aol.comIn a message dated 3/29/00 11:02:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, shephrdNOSPAM@earthlink.net
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:16:09 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <ea.3790a07.26143d19@aol.com>
In a message dated 3/29/00 11:02:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, shephrdNOSPAM@earthlink.net writes: << When the older, jaded idm'ers say that all the new idm sucks, I wonder if they've heard any of this stuff. >> As perhaps the archetypical jaded record collector I just want to kick a few points into the discussion: 1) There is as much good stuff coming out in 2000 as there was in 1994. However we've forgotten all the crap from 1994, the collective underground has decided which tracks to remember for whatever reason, and so 1994 seems much better than it was. In 2006, 2000 will look much better than it does now. 2) There is not as high a percentage of good stuff in 2000 as there was in 1990 or 1991. Of course, I'm not sure any year in electronic music can compete with the years Detroit and the UK were on top, especially since in those days there wasn't nearly as much bad stuff as today because there weren't nearly as many records. But listen to say, "Warp 10+1 Influences". Derrick May, Mr. Fingers, Virgo, Model 500, Phuture, first, then the rest. Derrick May and Mr. Fingers are still sought after today. Nitro Deluxe and the Unique 3 don't get as much press. Some stuff holds up, some doesn't. 3) Music evolves. Many people are specifically attuned to music from the era that drew them into electronic music. I started around 1993 myself. I generally like music from 1988-1993 better than current stuff. I'd guess the lion's share of this list is 1996-2000, which is pretty much the era of post-AI Warp, Skam, and their idolators, instead of May, Banks, Dog, and their idolators. Times change. That's not a problem. But I can still critique new stuff if I find it lacking, just as you can laud it if you find it exceptional. 4) It's unfair to assert that most fans of old music haven't heard new stuff. I've heard a lot of the output of Arovane, Fakesch, Skam, MaS, Schematic, and just haven't cared for it. Period. I have many specific complaints, but the main one is that when I put on a Black Dog, a Florence, a Redcell, a Nuron, a Beltran, a Fingers, a May, a 69, whoever track, then put on a Skam/new Warp-esque track, the one I want to hear over and over is the old one. Of course, I realize most of the stuff I listed is deep 313, not IDM. Whatever. It's all electronic. 5) There _is_ good music coming out these days. The Archive label out of Italy has about nine fantastic releases, Seiji is a great producer, Simulant are great, Nubian Mindz and most of the 2000 Black camp are great, Jay Denham, KDJ, Ian O'Brien, Russ Gabriel and Theo Parrish are still on top of their game, Jamie Read and Chris Grey still have a great material appearing, Playhouse, Klang, Perlon and Ware have some strong stuff, Gramm, SND, Vladislav Delay and Sutekh are getting rave reviews from many different directions, etc. 6) I know I might be setting myself up here, but I would encourage all fans of Schematic, or Warp, or Ninja Tune, or Clear, or whatever, to check out a lot of the old techno stuff (or the new techno stuff, but the old stuff provides a good background). I realize these days finding copies of this stuff is difficult, but listen to one of the first three John Beltran albums, the Red Planet 12"s, the very early Black Dog (first seven or so 12"s and the first album), early Reload/Link/GC, most of the first and second waves out of Detroit, and heck, some Gottsching, Marshall Jefferson and even Kraftwerk while you're at it. If you hear that stuff, and still think Schematic and Warp are better, I won't agree but I'll respect that you checked it; I really think everyone should at least check out some of that old techno: it's life-changing music. Remember that this is what got many of today's producers started. 7) I realize this is perhaps a long and complicated argument responding to a rather innocent sentence, and I don't want to seem like I'm disagreeing or jumping on somebody. I just think there is a lot of "old -vs- new" discussion on this list these days and wanted to say what I felt and hopefully be articulate and specific on this very important debate. Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 06:12brucelevspeaking of which, are there any readily available CD compilations that would serve as goo
From:
brucelev
To:
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:12:05 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <v031028006351b6df1a8b@[199.174.52.183]>
speaking of which, are there any readily available CD compilations that would serve as good primer for the classic/detroit techno sound? i've been meaning to check into IDM's roots.
quoted 14 lines 6) I know I might be setting myself up here, but I would encourage>6) I know I might be setting myself up here, but I would encourage >all fans of Schematic, or Warp, or Ninja Tune, or Clear, or whatever, >to check out a lot of the old techno stuff (or the new techno stuff, >but the old stuff provides a good background). I realize these days >finding copies of this stuff is difficult, but listen to one of the first >three John Beltran albums, the Red Planet 12"s, the very early Black >Dog (first seven or so 12"s and the first album), early Reload/Link/GC, >most of the first and second waves out of Detroit, and heck, some >Gottsching, Marshall Jefferson and even Kraftwerk while you're at it. If you >hear >that stuff, and still think Schematic and Warp are better, I won't agree but >I'll respect that you checked it; I really think everyone should at least >check out some of that old techno: it's life-changing music. >Remember that this is what got many of today's producers started.
---------------------------------------------- D is for Desond thrown out of a sleigh ---------------------------------------------- bruce levenstein bruceLev@mindspring.com ---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 06:24Lance @ InaudibleAt 01:12 AM 3/30/2000 -0500, you wrote: >speaking of which, are there any readily availabl
From:
Lance @ Inaudible
To:
brucelev
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:24:19 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Classic Detroit releases
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <4.3.2.20000330010855.00abb3a0@mail.nacs.net>
At 01:12 AM 3/30/2000 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 3 lines speaking of which, are there any readily available CD compilations that>speaking of which, are there any readily available CD compilations that >would serve as good primer for the classic/detroit techno sound? i've been >meaning to check into IDM's roots.
The key words here are "readily available." There are some great detroit techno cd comps like Virtual Sex, Relics, Techno One & Two, Panic In Detroit, and Biorhythms One & Two but they are all hopelessly out of print. The detroit techno comps worth checking out these days would be: . Elements of & Experiments with Sound comp cd (Planet E) . Intergalactic Beats comp cd (Planet E) . Art of Dance - Exhibits comp cd (Art of Dance) . Detroit - Beyond the Third Wave comp cd (Astralwerks) . True People comp 2xcd (React) . Digital Sects vol 2 comp cd (Matrix) . Deep Detroit Vol. 1 comp cd (Pow Wow) . Depth Charge vol 1 comp cd (Submerge) . Depth Charge vol 2 comp cd (Submerge) . Depth Charge vol 3 comp cd (Submerge) . Depth Charge vol 4 comp cd (Submerge) . Origins of a Sound comp cd (Submerge) And these are classics as well: . Derrick May: innovator 2xcd (Transmat) . Psyche/BFC: elements cd (Planet E) . Model 500: classics cd (R&S) . Model 500: sonic sunset cd (R&S) -->-Lance--- lance@inaudible.com p.o. box 450715 westlake, ohio 44145 united states --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 06:34Douglas Smithon 30/3/00 1:12 AM, brucelev at brucelev@mindspring.com wrote: > speaking of which, are th
From:
Douglas Smith
To:
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:34:49 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) IDM's Roots
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <B5085FB8.AAE%gropo@gropo.com>
on 30/3/00 1:12 AM, brucelev at brucelev@mindspring.com wrote:
quoted 3 lines speaking of which, are there any readily available CD compilations that> speaking of which, are there any readily available CD compilations that > would serve as good primer for the classic/detroit techno sound? i've been > meaning to check into IDM's roots.
I suggest that anyone who wishes to intuitively research the roots of IDM listen to ALOT of Wendy Carlos. Wendy Carlos IS the original synth I feel that no IDM artist has yet even approached his/her level of arrangement. Thanks to the compositions of the great masters, it's the only synth music that can bring tears to my eyes... I feel all IDM composers of today can learn alot from his/her recordings. (Hey, the Boards of Canada admit they already do) P.S. stay away from "Switched on Bach 2000" [ WendyCarlos + MIDI = SUCK ] -Doug Douglas C. Smith €Analog Line : 617-718-9277 27 Gilman Terr. Apt. # 1 Somerville, MA 02145 €Digital Line : http://gropo.dhs.org ________________ __ _ _ http://www.gropo.com _________________ ___ __ _ Live365.com MP3cast: http://216.32.166.75:8774 ________________ ____ ___ __ _ hotline://sontop.dhs.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 13:57John Bush> speaking of which, are there any readily > available CD compilations that would serve as
From:
John Bush
To:
brucelev ,
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:57:27 -0500
Subject:
RE: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <NCBBJAFPKLAFMEAFAFOBOEIGDOAA.johbus@allmusic.com>
quoted 4 lines speaking of which, are there any readily> speaking of which, are there any readily > available CD compilations that would serve as > good primer for the classic/detroit techno > sound? i've been meaning to check into IDM's roots.
If you're going to buy just one, I'd choose Warp10+1 Influences (Warp), out last year through Matador in the states. Available everywhere, widest variety, best tracks, rawest sound, all the way from Mr. Fingers to 808 State (caveat: no UR). Get a CDNow coupon and it'd probably be $10 or less for a 2-CD comp... Here're the others I'd pick up next: Psyche/BFC: Elements 1989-1990 (Planet E) Red Planet: A Red Planet Compilation (Red Planet) Kevin Saunderson: Faces & Phases (Planet E) Model 500: Classics (R&S) There are reviews/tracklistings/etc. for all of the above at http://allmusic.com/. Enjoy! .John. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 13:22Kelley HackettHows this: Point 2, 3, 4, 6....Listen to the man! Hey Matt, how about you be my spokesman!
From:
Kelley Hackett
To:
,
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:22:12 -0500
Subject:
RE: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <397CA68ABF5AD111863C00805F0DDE980E3314@aba.iupui.edu>
Hows this: Point 2, 3, 4, 6....Listen to the man! Hey Matt, how about you be my spokesman! Hee hee..... John Beltrans music is so brilliant that I just listened to Placid( I hope I get this rite Tek-head) Angeles, yesterday....and Clearly No one was making that OVER ALL type of Melodic sound.....NO ONE THAT I'VE HEARD! Incredible & Original! Hk! -----Original Message----- From: AeOtaku@aol.com [mailto:AeOtaku@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 12:16 AM To: idm@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases In a message dated 3/29/00 11:02:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, shephrdNOSPAM@earthlink.net writes: << When the older, jaded idm'ers say that all the new idm sucks, I wonder if they've heard any of this stuff. >> As perhaps the archetypical jaded record collector I just want to kick a few points into the discussion: 1) There is as much good stuff coming out in 2000 as there was in 1994. However we've forgotten all the crap from 1994, the collective underground has decided which tracks to remember for whatever reason, and so 1994 seems much better than it was. In 2006, 2000 will look much better than it does now. 2) There is not as high a percentage of good stuff in 2000 as there was in 1990 or 1991. Of course, I'm not sure any year in electronic music can compete with the years Detroit and the UK were on top, especially since in those days there wasn't nearly as much bad stuff as today because there weren't nearly as many records. But listen to say, "Warp 10+1 Influences". Derrick May, Mr. Fingers, Virgo, Model 500, Phuture, first, then the rest. Derrick May and Mr. Fingers are still sought after today. Nitro Deluxe and the Unique 3 don't get as much press. Some stuff holds up, some doesn't. 3) Music evolves. Many people are specifically attuned to music from the era that drew them into electronic music. I started around 1993 myself. I generally like music from 1988-1993 better than current stuff. I'd guess the lion's share of this list is 1996-2000, which is pretty much the era of post-AI Warp, Skam, and their idolators, instead of May, Banks, Dog, and their idolators. Times change. That's not a problem. But I can still critique new stuff if I find it lacking, just as you can laud it if you find it exceptional. 4) It's unfair to assert that most fans of old music haven't heard new stuff. I've heard a lot of the output of Arovane, Fakesch, Skam, MaS, Schematic, and just haven't cared for it. Period. I have many specific complaints, but the main one is that when I put on a Black Dog, a Florence, a Redcell, a Nuron, a Beltran, a Fingers, a May, a 69, whoever track, then put on a Skam/new Warp-esque track, the one I want to hear over and over is the old one. Of course, I realize most of the stuff I listed is deep 313, not IDM. Whatever. It's all electronic. 5) There _is_ good music coming out these days. The Archive label out of Italy has about nine fantastic releases, Seiji is a great producer, Simulant are great, Nubian Mindz and most of the 2000 Black camp are great, Jay Denham, KDJ, Ian O'Brien, Russ Gabriel and Theo Parrish are still on top of their game, Jamie Read and Chris Grey still have a great material appearing, Playhouse, Klang, Perlon and Ware have some strong stuff, Gramm, SND, Vladislav Delay and Sutekh are getting rave reviews from many different directions, etc. 6) I know I might be setting myself up here, but I would encourage all fans of Schematic, or Warp, or Ninja Tune, or Clear, or whatever, to check out a lot of the old techno stuff (or the new techno stuff, but the old stuff provides a good background). I realize these days finding copies of this stuff is difficult, but listen to one of the first three John Beltran albums, the Red Planet 12"s, the very early Black Dog (first seven or so 12"s and the first album), early Reload/Link/GC, most of the first and second waves out of Detroit, and heck, some Gottsching, Marshall Jefferson and even Kraftwerk while you're at it. If you hear that stuff, and still think Schematic and Warp are better, I won't agree but I'll respect that you checked it; I really think everyone should at least check out some of that old techno: it's life-changing music. Remember that this is what got many of today's producers started. 7) I realize this is perhaps a long and complicated argument responding to a rather innocent sentence, and I don't want to seem like I'm disagreeing or jumping on somebody. I just think there is a lot of "old -vs- new" discussion on this list these days and wanted to say what I felt and hopefully be articulate and specific on this very important debate. Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 14:28Ross BalmerWhat a great thread this is! Nice to see a constructive comparison going on in these days
From:
Ross Balmer
To:
IDM
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:28:19 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <022801bf9a54$368bdf90$7801010a@tuimedia.co.uk>
What a great thread this is! Nice to see a constructive comparison going on in these days of flames and bitching. Yeah I agree with all you guys. I love the old stuff, I live for that kind of music, but I certainly don't think that most idm these days is crap. I think the best and most interesting stuff these days are things like Vladislav Delay and Gramm, which are not as approachable as the older melodic stuff but really are incredibly good. And there _are_ nice melodies around these days anyway, check out Arovane or Plod. Not much can beat John Beltran though, it's true. And yeah, I for one do remember all the awful stuff that was around in '94, though I'd prefer not to! Ross. ----- Original Message ----- From: Kelley Hackett <khackett@aba.iupui.edu> To: <AeOtaku@aol.com>; <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:22 PM Subject: RE: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
quoted 6 lines Hows this:> Hows this: > > Point 2, 3, 4, 6....Listen to the man! > Hey Matt, how about you be my spokesman! Hee hee..... > > John Beltrans music is so brilliant that I just listened to Placid( I hope
I
quoted 1 line get this rite Tek-head) Angeles, yesterday....and Clearly No one was> get this rite Tek-head) Angeles, yesterday....and Clearly No one was
making
quoted 5 lines that OVER ALL type of Melodic sound.....NO ONE THAT I'VE HEARD!> that OVER ALL type of Melodic sound.....NO ONE THAT I'VE HEARD! > > Incredible & Original! > > Hk!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-30 14:53GilI can't say I agree here with the general feeling about older idm being that much better.
From:
Gil
To:
IDM list
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:53:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) .rambling. Thoughts on recent idm purchases
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Thoughts on recent idm purchases
permalink · <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003300930410.28139-100000@nowhere.fragment.com>
I can't say I agree here with the general feeling about older idm being that much better. I've prety much been listening to electronic music, critically since the late 80s. Now granted I'm not a label whore or trainspotter by any means and I've probably missed hundreds of great albums, But I've probably heard 75-90% of the classics. (I'm actually going to extend this to EDM in general, though to some of you it might not be fair - but we include techno, tech house, d'n'b, etc on this list) Of anything, the music has gotten better and more complex over the years - the attention to detail has gone way through the roof, and this has to only be a good thing. WWhile the original spirit of experimentation might be lost, I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing. I love complexity and evolution of styles. That's what we've been seeing. Used to be in the earlier 90s I'd listen to music and think I could write something similar, but listening to the current crop of IDM leaves me thinking I have no chance of writing music up to that level. Case in point: just yesterday I finally got a vinyl copy of Global Comm's 74.16 (?), This album used to floor me when it came out. Although it's still nice and timeless, if I played it next to the new arovane CD, the GC would sound dated and pale in comparison. There are a very few artists whose older works can stand up next to todays works, and they are the real pioneers (for some reason Jeff Mills is popping into my head now), but I really think the vast majority of producers, and many of whom you as a collective list cannonize have their place in the evolution of IDM but did not write their best music in 93. It's that whole problem about getting interested in an artist at a certain moment in their musical development and latching on to that as their best work. I'm guilty of that with the smashing pumpkins. But seriously, IDM has been getting better and better year by year. There are always classics, but in a genre of music where pushing the envelope is part of the aesthetic, I think those of you are trying to hold on to so much of yesterday's music really need to accept the fact that yours is not the general feeling. -Gil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org