IDM Mailing Archive

1997-01-31 07:57Karl-Michael SchneiderWhat is Kulma like, compared to Osasto? Thanks, Karl-Michael.

From:: Karl-Michael Schneider <schneide@pike.phil.uni-passau.de>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.com>
Date:: Fri, 31 Jan 97 08:57:58 +0100
Subject:: (idm) Panasonic Kulma

What is Kulma like, compared to Osasto? Thanks, Karl-Michael.

1997-06-13 12:01galaxey@earthlink.netOK finally listened to my first Panasonic release: KULMA do all Panasonic releases sound l

From:: 0 <galaxey@earthlink.net>
To:: <idm@hyperreal.com>
Date:: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:01:46 +0000
Subject:: (idm) Panasonic Kulma

OK finally listened to my first Panasonic release: KULMA do all Panasonic releases sound like this? I hope not, because it was shit!!! What the heck do the people at MUTE think. One track was nothing but a sound going thru a flange pedal, anybody can do that. Another track sounded like a filter self oscillating: HEre let me turn on my keyboard now listen. What the fuck. Panasonic has gotten some great remarks on this list, so I hope there something more to them than this shit. This was worse then some of the worst FAX (then again there aren't any bad FAX releases) ciao, 0 np: Third Eye Foundation - Ghost (wanna get scared?)

1997-06-14 14:00Erkki Rautio> OK finally listened to my first Panasonic release: KULMA > do all Panasonic releases sou

From:: Erkki Rautio <trerra@uta.fi>
To:: anAlFiXation <idm@hyperreal.com>
Date:: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 14:00:02 +0300 (EET DST)
Subject:: Re: (idm) Panasonic Kulma

quoted 8 lines OK finally listened to my first Panasonic release: KULMA

> OK finally listened to my first Panasonic release: KULMA > do all Panasonic releases sound like this? I hope not, because it was shit!!! > What the heck do the people at MUTE think. One track was nothing but a sound > going thru a flange pedal, anybody can do that. Another track sounded like a > filter self oscillating: HEre let me turn on my keyboard now listen. What > the fuck. Panasonic has gotten some great remarks on this list, so I hope > there something more to them than this shit. This was worse then some of > the worst FAX (then again there aren't any bad FAX releases)

Any publicity is good publicity. http://www.sci.fi/~phinnweb/panasonic.html transmission from the pHinnWeb Bunker over, ekku the maintainer of pHinnWeb - everything u ever wanted to know about Finnish electronica scene but were too afraid of the reindeer trerra@uta.fi | http://www.uta.fi/~trerra | http://www.sci.fi/~phinnweb

1997-06-16 21:15Mark Kolmar> > do all Panasonic releases sound like this? I hope not, because it was shit!!! > > What

From:: Mark Kolmar <mkolmar@xnet.com>
To:: anAlFiXation <idm@hyperreal.com>
Date:: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 16:15:33 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:: Re: (idm) Panasonic Kulma
Reply to:: Re: (idm) Panasonic Kulma

quoted 3 lines do all Panasonic releases sound like this? I hope not, because it was shit!!!

> > do all Panasonic releases sound like this? I hope not, because it was shit!!! > > What the heck do the people at MUTE think. One track was nothing but a sound > > going thru a flange pedal, anybody can do that. Another track sounded like a

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sure. However: First, you have to think of the idea. Then the idea has to get past your internal censor. Then you'd have to actually do it, with some amount of elegance. If the objective is to focus the listener on the changes in one parameter, one good way is to minimize the changes in other parameters. Think of the tweaking of acid basslines, the way a hip-hop beat can put the rapper in the foreground.... Or the way Scelsi's orchestral music embellishes basically a single note for 15 minutes, but never stops moving. --Mark

Re: (idm) Panasonic Kulma