179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) In defense of Orbi

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-03-18 21:23Iain Newton Re: (idm) In defense of Orbi
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-03-18 21:23Iain NewtonReply to: RE>(idm) In defense of Orbital (was seconded - and i would also like to add that
From:
Iain Newton
To:
Aimee Merritt , ,
Date:
18 Mar 1997 16:23:10 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) In defense of Orbi
permalink · <9703182123.AA26566@uu3.psi.com>
Reply to: RE>(idm) In defense of Orbital (was seconded - and i would also like to add that i just joined this list and aimee's reply is the first mail i opened - i like this list already if these are the sort of debates going on - cheers iain ps. even if they only did it for the money would it mean "selling out"? and, secondly, "the sinner" (b-side) is very good imho. -------------------------------------- Date: 3/18/97 4:16 PM To: Iain Newton From: Aimee Merritt Orbital have been wanting to make soundtracks for years and have repeatedly said so in interviews. If they were offered the Saint, why shouldn't they take it? Just because it's a Hollywood film? Since they are so enamored with John Barry's music, I'm sure the prospect of making a spy theme was what appealed to them rather than the enormous wads of cash that they're undoubtedly earning. Selling out usually implies doing something solely for monetary reward instead of for personal gratification. By this logic, Orbital are far from selling out-- they are finally getting to do what they've wanted to do for some time.