179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) boards of canada (selftitled) / autechre 'keynell rmx'

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-12-22 01:10Alex Reynolds (idm) boards of canada (selftitled) / autechre 'keynell rmx'
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-12-22 01:10Alex Reynoldsbriefly, the new boards of canada (skam) is just incredible makeout music; almost every tr
From:
Alex Reynolds
To:
Date:
Sat, 21 Dec 1996 20:10:28 -0500
Subject:
(idm) boards of canada (selftitled) / autechre 'keynell rmx'
permalink · <Pine.SGI.3.93.961221194609.26007B-100000@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>
briefly, the new boards of canada (skam) is just incredible makeout music; almost every track (except for nlogix) is really sensuous electronic funk, without the fromage. i plan to make good use of this record on a wet, rainy night with the perfect mate . . . 9/10 on the other hand, the autechre keynell remix was slightly disappointing. the first side is good, though lengthy, with a nice beaty motif that runs for a couple minutes, jumps to the babble scratching from E1 of the original gescom release, and returns to the motif to close it up. the second side is a slow, plodding song that i would use for a love scene, were i to shoot a film with such a scene. it goes on a bit too long for my taste, but i give credit to autechre for remixing a track which can't be traced back (easily) to the original gescom track. i'd say 6/10 but since they had to remix songs from a brilliant ep to start with, my hopes were higher than they should have been. ergo, 7/10. qed. obnonIDM: speaking as one who has written a number of non-personal web pages, let me just make a quick comment: if you have to balance school and work with writing a page for a student group that requires constant rewriting and updating, you must decide how you're going to allocate your time. i have two versions for this page, one with frames, and one without and with minimal graphics. i will tell you right now that i would rather (and i do) spend more time on the framed page, which gives a better interface and a more professional look. as a matter of personal pride i write a page for a browser which gives the best, most consistent looking and easily codable page. this is netscape, hands down, but the point is that if you're not getting paid to do a page, and you don't have unlimited time/resources on your hands, you have to make a decision. the people who code the browsers have decided to go ahead with their own html "standards"; it's a shitty situation that doesn't benefit everyone, but that's the reality. face up to it, and if you code, make a choice and live with it. don't give people a hard time because they don't write a page for lynx (!), mosaic (!!), or aol (no comment) browsers. evolve to netscape, folks. thanks, and a cool yule to all of ye, alex Alexander ("Alex" will do nicely) Peter Reynolds polygon@jhu.edu http://jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu/~polygon http://www.jhu.edu/~jhufilm - Senior User Consultant Homewood Academic Computing, Johns Hopkins University, Homewood Campus Baltimore, MD USA