179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Spinning CDs - Argh! More...

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-03-23 23:39Joshua (idm) Spinning CDs - Argh! More...
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-03-23 23:39JoshuaTo occupy a middle ground of sorts: 1. I spin CDs in my DJ sets and at home for a variety
From:
Joshua
To:
Date:
Sat, 23 Mar 1996 16:39:02 -0700
Subject:
(idm) Spinning CDs - Argh! More...
permalink · <v01530500ad7a356904eb@[206.80.9.10]>
To occupy a middle ground of sorts: 1. I spin CDs in my DJ sets and at home for a variety of reasons. Having mastered music on vinyl and on CD, I am all too familiar with the compromises one must make in getting music into analog grooves, especially into grooves of long 12-inch pressings made at 33 RPM. I also don't much fancy surface noise fluffing its way into quiet passages, nor do I like the idea that each play of my favorite vinyl degrades the sound of the next. CDs, even with my very low-tech set-up (two cheapo CD-walkboys - actually, I have yet to determine their genders), are easier to cart around to DJ sets (two portables, headphones, and a disc wallet fit nicely into a backpack) and are quite handy for repetitive recueing of tracks). 2. A very well pressed piece of ideal vinyl (i.e. 12-inch, 45 RPM, less than 5 minutes of program material per side, originating with a gourmet pressing plant) usually can beat a CD for pure viscerality of sound. But the average cheeezzzily pressed LP, without a rather amazing turntable, sinks mightily. 3. Despite all of this, I miss the age of vinyl for aesthetic reasons. A well-printed cover on good stock offers a tactile and visual feast (and often a beautiful trip tableau), whereas a jewel case, of generic and easily scratchable and crackable plastic, offers little comfort, especially when the shrunken artwork presents an ergonomic struggle in its removal. Jewel cases also take up about 5 times the width of their contents, making them both profound wastes of plastic and of shelf space. To me, the "digipack" is not a solution either - it too contains breakable plastic tabs and takes up too much space. Some labels - Touch comes to mind - have been experimenting with more pleasurable paper packaging for a while now, and the good old slipsleeve is a quite satisfactory alternative. CDs can be delicious as well as nutritious. 4. Tube amplification returns to CDs analog warmth, while retaining digital repeatability. 5. Beware the spell-checker: ClarisWorks corrects *DJing* as *dying*! Whatever is it trying to say? (I spell-check as *merriment*.) Joshua thermal@hooked.net Thermal & Freezer web page: http://www.hooked.net/users/thermal