179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: Gescom (was LFO)

4 messages · 3 participants · spans 3 days · search this subject
1995-10-04 12:16Edward Pond Re: Gescom (was LFO)
1995-10-05 08:13Maarten D. Schermer Re: Gescom (was LFO)
1995-10-05 23:22g303 Re: Gescom (was LFO)
1995-10-07 16:05g303 Re: Gescom (was LFO)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1995-10-04 12:16Edward Pond>Another thing: earlier this year I bought the second Gescom 12", >"Snakewitch", and it's
From:
Edward Pond
To:
Cc:
IDM Mailing list
Date:
04 Oct 95 08:16:54 EDT
Subject:
Re: Gescom (was LFO)
permalink · <951004121653_100550.2422_EHK48-2@CompuServe.COM>
quoted 5 lines Another thing: earlier this year I bought the second Gescom 12",>Another thing: earlier this year I bought the second Gescom 12", >"Snakewitch", and it's labels have Side C and Side D on it. Did they give me >only one 12" of a double pack, or is it the companion (or something) to Side >A & B of their first single? >
I got this along with sides A and B. The first 12" is a four tracker and in my opinion is completely different to sides C and D. It is much more like the Autechre sound and I much prefer it. Get it if you can, it's on Skam. Doesn't the label on your record say "snackwitch" hence the sandwich toasters? A review also called this snakewitch and I wondered if there is a connection? You said this was the second Gescom release. What was the first? The only other Gescom I have is "Sounds of machines..." and I want more! -Ed
1995-10-05 08:13Maarten D. Schermer>I got this along with sides A and B. The first 12" is a four tracker and in my >opinion i
From:
Maarten D. Schermer
To:
Edward Pond
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 5 Oct 1995 09:13:07 +0100
Subject:
Re: Gescom (was LFO)
permalink · <199510050813.AA18444@xs1.xs4all.nl>
quoted 8 lines I got this along with sides A and B. The first 12" is a four tracker and in my>I got this along with sides A and B. The first 12" is a four tracker and in my >opinion is completely different to sides C and D. It is much more like the >Autechre sound and I much prefer it. Get it if you can, it's on Skam. >Doesn't the label on your record say "snackwitch" hence the sandwich >toasters? A review also called this snakewitch and I wondered if there is >a connection? >You said this was the second Gescom release. What was the first? >The only other Gescom I have is "Sounds of machines..." and I want more!
As far as I know the first two releases were both on Skam: Gescom EP 12" (Skam SKA 02): Dan One / Five / Cicada / Sciew Spoc Snackwitch 12" (Skam SKA 03): Snackwitch / MAG Could the 4 tracker you have be the fisrt one?? It was supposed to be a separate release though. Hey, I would love to get the first 12", I just wouldn't know where... anyone has a spare copy? Maarten
1995-10-05 23:22g303At 09:13 05/10/95 +0100, you wrote: >>You said this was the second Gescom release. What wa
From:
g303
To:
Maarten D. Schermer , IDM
Date:
Thu, 5 Oct 1995 16:22:00 -0700
Subject:
Re: Gescom (was LFO)
permalink · <9510060014.aa15290@relay-3.mail.demon.net>
At 09:13 05/10/95 +0100, you wrote:
quoted 7 lines You said this was the second Gescom release. What was the first?>>You said this was the second Gescom release. What was the first? >>The only other Gescom I have is "Sounds of machines..." and I want more! > >As far as I know the first two releases were both on Skam: > >Gescom EP 12" (Skam SKA 02): Dan One / Five / Cicada / Sciew Spoc >Snackwitch 12" (Skam SKA 03): Snackwitch / MAG
As I have previously stated SKAM 001 is not available. No one has this record. SKAM 004 is Freeform aka Simon Pyke. Acquire! g3 g The WARP Web Site 3 0 3 http://www.ncl.ac.uk/~n264671/wap-indx.html
1995-10-07 16:05g303At 08:57 06/10/95 -0400, you wrote: >.As I have previously stated SKAM 001 is not availabl
From:
g303
To:
Robert P. Beveridge , IDM
Date:
Sat, 7 Oct 1995 09:05:51 -0700
Subject:
Re: Gescom (was LFO)
permalink · <9510071532.aa08467@relay-3.mail.demon.net>
At 08:57 06/10/95 -0400, you wrote:
quoted 3 lines .As I have previously stated SKAM 001 is not available. No one has this record>.As I have previously stated SKAM 001 is not available. No one has this record > >So it goes. But did it _ever_ exist? Inquiring minds want to know...
It exists now. But no-one has it (or will ever have it). Look at the name of the record label and figure it out for yourself. g3 g The WARP Web Site 3 0 3 http://www.ncl.ac.uk/~n264671/wap-indx.html