quoted 8 lines What's the point of calling it a best of '94 poll then? Either releases
>What's the point of calling it a best of '94 poll then? Either releases
>from this year are the only ones that should count (or things released
>some arbitrary date late last year, which would only make things more
>confusing), or we might as well call it an alltime best of idm poll.
>We've done that before. But again, I defer to the pollster's judgement.
>(If he announces that the year of release is irrelevant, though, I'll
>feel real funny voting for Keith LeBlanc's 'Major Malfunction' from
>1986).
I think it's clear from the poll form that I intended you to consider
releases from 1994. I had thought of an all time poll but went off this
idea for two main reasons:
(i) I thought responses might be too diverse to get a consensus from
the likely number of replies.
(ii) For the results to be used as a shopping list by anyone looking for
low risk purchases it ought to be stuff that's still readily available.
There are of course borderline cases and there's no way I going to check
out release dates for everything you vote on (especially in different
markets). But remember that, for example, by voting for Incunabula (as
it's already been mentioned) you will be voting for something that many
people will have disregarded due to the 1993 release.
I hope that clears things up.
BTW, I'm receiving a steady flow of votes but looking forward to many,
many more. From everyone, in fact !!
OnNow: Mystic Institute - Ob-Selon Mi-Mos (Global Communications)
jbuzza@cix.compulink.co.uk (Jon Burrell) Space,Time,Grooving......