179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

ziq error?

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: u-ziq error? · ziq error?
1994-10-13 05:51Alan M. Parry ziq error?
└─ 1994-10-13 06:05mRays Re: ziq error?
├─ 1994-10-13 08:36Greg Earle Re: u-Ziq error?
└─ 1994-10-13 15:17CiM Re: ziq error?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-10-13 05:51Alan M. ParrySomeone pointed out to me that their R&S Ziq had a different tracklisting to the one I hav
From:
Alan M. Parry
To:
IDM
Date:
Wed, 12 Oct 1994 22:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
ziq error?
permalink · <Pine.3.89.9410122230.A8176-0100000@taz.hyperreal.com>
Someone pointed out to me that their R&S Ziq had a different tracklisting to the one I have - Anyone else have this listing? weird. Black Side: 1. PHI*1700(u/v) 2. Paco Silver Side: 1. Crosstown Traffic 2. Xolbe II ?? (mine lists "Paco" as track 1, silver side and "Glink" as track 2, black side) :: Alan M. Parry :: fluid@hyperreal.com :: <finger me for PGP key> :: http://hyperreal.com/~fluid
1994-10-13 06:05mRaysOn Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote: > > Someone pointed out to me that their R&S Ziq
From:
mRays
To:
Alan M. Parry
Cc:
IDM
Date:
Thu, 13 Oct 1994 01:05:38 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: ziq error?
Reply to:
ziq error?
permalink · <Pine.3.89.9410130153.A23578-0100000@corn.cso.niu.edu>
On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote:
quoted 12 lines Someone pointed out to me that their R&S Ziq had a different> > Someone pointed out to me that their R&S Ziq had a different > tracklisting to the one I have - Anyone else have this listing? > weird. > > Black Side: > 1. PHI*1700(u/v) > 2. Paco > Silver Side: > 1. Crosstown Traffic > 2. Xolbe II >
that's the track listing for the CD version of PHI*1700(u/v) ._.-. .-._. mRay ) ( z943159@corn.cso.niu.edu
1994-10-13 08:36Greg Earle>On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote: > >> Someone pointed out to me that their R&S Z
From:
Greg Earle
To:
Date:
Thu, 13 Oct 1994 01:36:32 -0700
Subject:
Re: u-Ziq error?
Reply to:
Re: ziq error?
permalink · <9410130836.AA22572@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US>
quoted 14 lines On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote:>On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote: > >> Someone pointed out to me that their R&S Ziq had a different >> tracklisting to the one I have - Anyone else have this listing? Weird. >> >> Black Side: >> 1. PHI*1700(u/v) >> 2. Paco >> >> Silver Side: >> 1. Crosstown Traffic >> 2. Xolbe II > > That's the track listing for the CD version of PHI*1700(u/v).
AUUUGGGH! You mean the CD for *this* has a different track listing, too? So does this mean that the same thing's gonna happen for the CD "re-release" of "Bluff Limbo" as happened for "Tango n' Vectif", i.e. some tracks removed and new ones substituted? Argggggh ...
quoted 2 lines [gordon@otax.tky.hut.fi]> [gordon@otax.tky.hut.fi] > Bluff Limbo (Rephlex Records CAT 018i)
quoted 10 lines After my initiation to u-Ziq's music with `Tango N' Vectif', I began to> After my initiation to u-Ziq's music with `Tango N' Vectif', I began to > crave for more. I lurked around in IDM, UK-Dance, alt.rave and > alt.music.techno to see if someone had come across other releases by this > group of steadily growing fame amongst the disciples of electronic music. At > last, someone mentioned `Bluff Limbo' (I think it was Alan Parry, I can't > remember, really). I thought, "great, I'll go and get it soon." Then, I > learned that this was a pre-release, and was quite depressed as my copy of > `Tango N' Vectif' had been spinning on my turntables for quite a while, and I > wanted something new. Well, I took things into my own hands, wrote to > RePHLeX and got the new album in the return mail. I was ecstatic.
*Ding* [Light bulb goes off over head] So, is it too late to write to RePHLeX and beg, grovel and plead for any spare vinyl copies lying in Grant & Claire's closets somewhere? :-) I suppose I can't complain ... the last time I went to (L.A.'s) DMC Records I was shocked to find a copy of Locust's "Needle" 12" (the supposedly 500-only thingy; the label was bog-standard Apollo but it was white instead of black). It's worth it for the track "Air Primary" alone; a full-on Aphex style stormer (didn't really expect that from Locust, least of all on an Apollo release (-: ) - Greg
1994-10-13 15:17CiMOn Thu, 13 Oct 1994, mRays wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote: > > > > Some
From:
CiM
To:
mRays
Cc:
Alan M. Parry , IDM
Date:
Thu, 13 Oct 1994 16:17:45 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: ziq error?
Reply to:
Re: ziq error?
permalink · <Pine.3.89.9410131651.C15219-0100000@radon.sys.uea.ac.uk>
On Thu, 13 Oct 1994, mRays wrote:
quoted 14 lines On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote:> On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Alan M. Parry wrote: > > > > Someone pointed out to me that their R&S Ziq had a different > > tracklisting to the one I have - Anyone else have this listing? > > weird. > > > > Black Side: > > 1. PHI*1700(u/v) > > 2. Paco > > Silver Side: > > 1. Crosstown Traffic > > 2. Xolbe II > > > that's the track listing for the CD version of PHI*1700(u/v)
My 12" of _Phi..._ has the listing shown above, so it can't be for the CD only. Looks like someone screwed up the track names, unless _Glink_ and _Crosstown Traffic_ are totally different tracks. For comparison, _Crosstown Traffic_ sounds like (IMO) _Beatnik No.2_ (or whatever the number is) as on _Tango..._ so if _Glink_ sounds like that, maybe they're the same tracks. I'm all confused now :-( [CiM]