| 1997-11-2723:24 | Steve /k/./F/ <kung.funk@virgin.net> | Re: TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO (was Re: (idm) Aphex is Techno!) > >which is surprising seeing as TECHNO was a phrase
> >first coined in… |
| 1997-11-2616:15 | <ReZOn8oR@aol.com> | Re: TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO (was Re: (idm) Aphex is Techno!) In a message dated 97-11-26 07:15:47 EST, you… |
| 1997-11-2515:32 | Steve /k/./F/ <kung.funk@virgin.net> | TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO (was Re: (idm) Aphex is Techno!) > Very interesting.
> I have noticed that you idm people problably didn´t… |
| 1997-11-2617:27 | <robert.merlak@ri.tel.hr> | Re: TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO (was Re: (idm) Aphex is Techno!) > << actually agree with you in some way. But the term "techno" sounds… |
| 1997-11-2612:16 | Fabio Henrique Freire Macedo <fabiomacedo@radnet.com.br> | Re: TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO (was Re: (idm) Aphex is Techno!)
>oh for gods sake.... when are you people gonna get it into… |
| 1997-11-2516:25 | <robert.merlak@ri.tel.hr> | Re: TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO (was Re: (idm) Aphex is Techno!) TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO
TECHNO TECHNO… |