| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2004-11-2021:50 | <ColonyUndaground@aol.com> | Re: [idm] Re: slsk names Nick James
reeeepoooooooortiiiing fooooor duuuuuutyyyy
|
| 2003-02-0412:18 | <Oneaphex@aol.com> | [idm] slsk
Umm, is it just me or has soulseek been down? Does anybody… |
| 2004-02-1715:41 | a.damessina <a.damessina@virgilio.it> | [idm] slsk Hy folks, i' ve just reinstalled Soulseek , but it d'nt work… |
| 2003-01-1920:16 | kingfool <kingfool@optonline.net> | [idm] slsk records newsletter issue #2 Soulseek Newsletter Is online thanks to Belgo and Humbliece!!!!!
Check it out… |
| 2004-06-0418:37 | max0666 <max0666@cox.net> | [idm] SLSK>>>>>> >>>SoulSeek is back up now for those greedy little downloaders!!!
=]
>>>np: Dirk… |
| 2003-02-0516:31 | Reczek, Erik <ereczek@classifiedventures.com> | [idm] slsk
Slsk should be back by friday. They are changing servers. For more… |
| 2003-09-0720:16 | Gil Videla <mvidelag@yahoo.com> | [idm] slsk ummm...what's the latest?
I haven't been able to get… |
| 2003-02-0416:20 | Bob Bannister <bobban@wextech.com> | RE: [idm] slsk Approaching 24 hours offline - perhaps the US authorities have shut it down… |
| 2004-02-1715:47 | seeklektek <eclectics@comcast.net> | Re: [idm] slsk From: "a.damessina"
> Hy folks, i' ve just reinstalled Soulseek , but it… |
| 2004-11-1922:01 | Jonathan Ackerman <jonathan.ackerman@gmail.com> | Re: [idm] Re: slsk names > speaking of soulseek-what are some people on this list soulseek handles… |
| 2002-09-1805:36 | Mike Brown <mike@hyperreal.org> | Re: [idm] filesharing... - Soulseek is at slsk.org JesseMuadDib@aol.com wrote:
> soulseek is deceased
Soulseek is alive and well… |
| 2003-09-0723:21 | Mike Brown <mike@hyperreal.org> | Re: [idm] slsk Jeff D wrote:
> SAVE it and thats all...
and don't forget… |
| 2003-02-2003:26 | kingfool <kingfool@optonline.net> | [idm] SLSK Records newsletter #4 This edition is updated with all the current news including the
absorb… |
| 2004-11-1921:58 | <Oneaphex@aol.com> | Re: [idm] Re: slsk names
In a message dated 11/19/2004 1:03:00 PM Pacific… |
| 2003-02-0502:56 | Steven <Steven@undosounds.com> | Re: [idm] slsk "The link at the bottom of your message is to a page… |
| 2003-02-0414:23 | skism <cazeone@ramdis.com> | RE: [idm] slsk it's been down since at least 1am GMT. don't know… |
| 2004-02-1720:00 | Jeffrey A. Osborn <jo009j@mail.rochester.edu> | Re: [idm] slsk > yeah... if you press a reciept from a major cd retailer to… |
| 2003-09-0822:18 | Nicholas Bolibruch <nboli@cogeco.ca> | [idm] Re: [inbox] [idm] slsk There's an update on their website if you find the other… |
| 2003-02-0417:26 | cutups <cutup@andythepooh.com> | Re: [idm] slsk > Yesterday, the server was offline all day. Today, you can't even… |
| 2004-06-0414:31 | first name last name <idm_poll@hotmail.com> | [idm] SLSK Apologies if this has been discussed (and it probably has), but, is… |
| 2004-02-1719:33 | Josh Steiner <josh@vitriolix.com> | Re: [idm] slsk
seeklektek wrote:
>From: "a.damessina"
>
>
>
>>Hy folks, i' ve just reinstalled Soulseek… |
| 2004-11-2103:54 | Manifestevil <manifest_evil@yahoo.com.au> | [idm] Re: slsk names
In a message dated 11/19/2004 1:03:00 PM Pacific… |
| 2004-10-0720:27 | StaticBeats <stupidnametaken@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] RARE BOC FOUND ON SLSK A Few Old Tunes can hardly be considered "rare" as
anyone spending… |
| 2003-02-0512:55 | jeremy.axon <jeremy@ums.ca> | Re: [idm] slsk - logic follows the better of the two rumors. a friend told me:
slsk is down, because of a server upgrade… |
| 2003-02-0500:39 | Steven <Steven@undosounds.com> | Re: [idm] slsk
> > Umm, is it just me or has soulseek been down? Does anybody… |
| 2003-02-0504:00 | Brandon Smith <gozravp@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] slsk - logic follows the better of the two rumors. Okay,
Based on what I've read there are two versions of… |
| 2003-02-0504:04 | Jeffrey A. Osborn <jo009j@mail.rochester.edu> | Re: [idm] slsk - logic follows the better of the two rumors.
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Brandon Smith wrote:
> Okay,
> Based on what… |
| 2004-10-0719:31 | Martin Wood <dynamichrt@hotmail.com> | [idm] RARE BOC FOUND ON SLSK I found 2 "discs" of apparent rare OLD BoC material on SLSK… |
| 2004-10-0721:30 | rb <rb@c67.org> | AW: [idm] RARE BOC FOUND ON SLSK
in my opinion:
yes, yes, yes, no(i think its the best… |
| 2003-02-0416:33 | IDM Poll <idm_poll@hotmail.com> | RE: [idm] slsk Yesterday, the server was offline all day. Today, you can't even… |
| 2003-09-0720:36 | Jeff D <kabal@ev01.net> | Re: [idm] slsk see :
http://slsk.blogspot.com/
also you can try this ...
locate a… |
| 2003-02-0501:05 | Bob Bannister <bobban@wextech.com> | Re: [idm] slsk
The link at the bottom of your message is to a page… |
| 2003-02-0505:32 | Richard Gray <hummer@crash.net.nz> | Re: [idm] slsk - logic follows the better of the two rumors. Or another possibility...
If the injunction is against nir's isp, then… |