179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
subject “reverb and the race issue (sorry!)” → 13 results
DateFromSubject
1995-01-2423:49Reverb Magazine Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
Matt: Word to your mum. :) - reverb
1995-01-2422:55Reverb Magazine Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
I agree with you Kent, especially the part about race not being…
1995-01-2423:46Mark Bowen Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
Is it really necessary to figure out who's culture was responsible…
1995-01-2419:55Reverb Magazine Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
Sorry Sandy, but you terribly misinterpreted my post. I would never be…
1995-01-2419:36Freeside Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
> >I don't like Reverb's implication that techno is an "original…
1995-01-2422:29matt23 Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
> From: Kent Williams (matt remix) > In jazz, and in blues, the black…
1995-01-2421:00Kent Williams Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
> And please, please don't bring that dusty-ass Kraftwerk excuse out…
1995-01-2405:58The Sandman Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
On Mon, 23 Jan 1995, Reverb Magazine wrote: > > Maybe just a couple…
1995-01-2515:06Kent Williams Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
> > As an example, you might be able to evaluate the songs of…
1995-01-2514:53Kent Williams Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
> the advantage of techno is that mostly the records consist of little…
1995-01-2514:39Dave Walker Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
I've been reading all this stuff for the last couple of…
1995-01-2503:52Christopher William Niemitz Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!)
On Tue, 24 Jan 1995, Kent Williams wrote: > > I think it's…
1995-01-2517:49Alan M. Parry Re: Reverb and the race issue (sorry!) (Fwd)
!!! Mail forwarded by idm-owner, fluid@hyperreal.com !!! !!! Original message and sender…