| 1998-08-0714:00 | Zenon M. Feszczak <feszczak@sas.upenn.edu> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good.
>>you can't see how much bjork's done for techno/idm… |
| 1998-08-0621:55 | Heatsink <heatsink@ospace.force9.co.uk> | (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good.
Is Chantal/Mira Calix she who did that track that goes "The… |
| 1998-08-0622:33 | Giles Ward <gilesw@globalnet.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. >>how else is the avg. American consumer going to hear music from… |
| 1998-08-0623:42 | eric <ehill@best.com> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. > she _sucks_.
what the fuck is wells so bitter about? why doesn… |
| 1998-08-0704:22 | Marc 3 Poirier <mpoirier@virtu.sar.usf.edu> | Re: (idm) Whether Bjork`s actually any good. (was Whether Chantal`s actually any good.) You all have no clue. None of you who attack Bjork have… |
| 1998-08-0614:02 | Shane Beers <ryoga@stratos.net> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. > Is Chantal/Mira Calix she who did that track that goes "The… |
| 1998-08-0621:31 | <windu@mindspring.com> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good.
>at least chantal isn't some moron halfwit who prances around pretending… |
| 1998-08-0623:32 | Michael Upton <username@sans.vuw.ac.nz> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, wells wrote:
| Yeah, put those Mira Calix… |
| 1998-08-0620:05 | Chris.Hilker <cspot@hyperreal.org> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. >there is more to making the music than sticking a few patch… |
| 1998-08-0620:13 | jif <jif@ottawa.com> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. > Funny how this is exactly what Bjork gets trashed all over this… |
| 1998-08-0723:47 | Daniel K. Taylor <crunknation@hotmail.com> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. id give her props for admitting idm is a good thing. she… |
| 1998-08-0621:17 | Jeremy Axon <yu214547@YorkU.CA> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. At 04:31 PM 06 - 08 - 1998 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>at least… |
| 1998-08-0700:01 | Meld Media <meld@idirect.com> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. >Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:01:03 -0400
>To: mark@sonance… |
| 1998-08-0622:40 | Mark Stevens <mark@sonance.demon.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. On Thu, 06 Aug 1998 16:19:13 -0400, you wrote:
>i… |
| 1998-08-0620:19 | wells <s0ewoliv@titan.vcu.edu> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. At 01:05 PM 8/6/98 -0700, Chris.Hilker wrote:
>>there… |
| 1998-08-0712:35 | Peter Hollo <raven@fourplay.com.au> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. wells wrote:
> yes, i'm sorry i restrict my musical tastes to… |
| 1998-08-0615:48 | siliconvortex <artist@sub-con-geo.demon.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. On Thu, 06 Aug 1998 10:02:13 -0400, you wrote:
>> Is… |
| 1998-08-0623:27 | wells <s0ewoliv@titan.vcu.edu> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. At 10:40 PM 8/6/98 GMT, Mark Stevens wrote:
>
>I… |
| 1998-08-0623:11 | Franz Enmark <frankie@gargamel.com> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. Hi,
At 22:40 1998-08-06 GMT, Mark Stevens wrote:
>Oh… |
| 1998-08-0622:40 | Mark Stevens <mark@sonance.demon.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. On Thu, 06 Aug 1998 16:13:09 -0400, you wrote:
>problem… |
| 1998-08-0619:48 | Shane Beers <ryoga@stratos.net> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. > >oh, im not saying i dont like the records,im just saying… |
| 1998-08-0721:47 | Mark Stevens <mark@sonance.demon.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. On Fri, 07 Aug 1998 01:11:48 +0200, you wrote:
>there… |
| 1998-08-0810:30 | Che <zeus8@synthcom.com> | Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good. At 07:27 PM 8/6/98 -0400, wells wrote:
>At 10… |