| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-03-0820:15 | mark soliday <minimal3000@yahoo.com> | (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez I've been under the impression that soft synth warez,
as nice… |
| 2000-03-0900:41 | Rishi Saez <fleshpile@hotmail.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez What I'd really like to find are some really drastic Direct… |
| 2000-03-0821:52 | <anything@synthesizer.org> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez > I've been under the impression that soft synth warez,
>as nice… |
| 2000-03-0821:41 | <TheevilD@aol.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez As far as I've seen, the cheaply available softsynths are pretty… |
| 2000-03-0822:05 | a.Puls <q_bot@yahoo.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez > Other great things that you're going to start seeing pop up… |
| 2000-03-0822:10 | a.Puls <q_bot@yahoo.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez --- atomly |
| 2000-03-0822:54 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez I wish that audio software would begin to branch out more on… |
| 2000-03-0820:28 | Ernesto Ikerd <IkerdEA@lmtas.lmco.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez > I've been under the impression that soft synth warez,
>as nice… |
| 2000-03-0823:12 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, a.Puls wrote:
> Have you ever messed… |
| 2000-03-0822:19 | Kent williams <kent@avalon.net> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, mark soliday wrote:
> I've been under… |
| 2000-03-0821:59 | Brock Suter <brock@alchemyfx.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez
mark soliday wrote:
> I've been under the impression that soft synth… |
| 2000-03-0905:53 | christian.adam.hresko. <godpup@ix.netcom.com> | Re: (idm) soft vs. hard 'warez
> It really depends on your computer. The Apple G4 processor has dedicated… |