179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Jeff Taylor
To:
IDM
Date:
17 May 1994 17:49:58 -0800
Subject:
Re: WIRED seefeel review
Msg-Id:
<199405180110.SAA16978@netcomsv.netcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9405.gz
Reply to: RE>WIRED seefeel review I have to agree. They create really nice textures, but over all, I yawn and fall to sleep. For music to turn me on, it has to take me somewhere. Music should be a fantastic voyage through sound and texture, not a 4bar textural loop over and over. Its the difference between taking a train cross-country and taking a cab 'round the block 10 times.. nuf sed. jeff taylor -------------------------------------- Date: 5/17/94 5:39 PM To: Jeff Taylor From: John Sweeney hey there- I just got the new WIRED today (June 94, not the zippie one =) and in the back in i think the "Street Cred" section they had a review of Quique. Thought all you would be interested.... Seefeel's thick compositions bombard the listener with repetition in the hope of tapping into some primal instinct, yet they ultimately fail. Strip away the excessive layers of judicious echo and delay, and each track consists merely of a few chords repeated in loop after relentless loop. A startling homogeneity of tiresome sounds accumulates over a lifeless drum track and the occaisonal swoop of Sarah Peacock's barely perceptible voice. Put simply, Seefeel shows genre-bending potential but ultimately smothers it under the short-lived novelty of noise processing. -Stephen Reese ---- john sweeney jds@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu binary sound(imprints)