179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Aaron Grier
Date:
Thu, 3 Feb 1994 23:11:23 -800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: Vinyl vs Cd
Mbox:
idm.9402.gz
On Thu, 3 Feb 1994, ma93ben wrote:
quoted 8 lines What you have to realise first is that there is an _absolute_ limit of the> What you have to realise first is that there is an _absolute_ limit of the > sound quality on CDs: 44.1 Khz. With analogue formats, it is possible to be > precise to a molecular level, so the sound quality can genuinely approach > perfection. If the energy wasted on hyping digital formats was used on > advancing analogue technology then the potential for better quality sound > would be far greater. Lukey said vinyl technology has not advanced since the > 1970s; this is because it is being phased out. If it was not being phased > out then the technology would have advanced.
Here here! You know I've thought a lot about doing something like that. Howsabout an analog disc which could be laser read instead of stylus read? Or a helical-scan compact cassette tape? The world is analog. Digital will ALWAYS be an approximation of our analog world. Else it ceases to be sampling -- it will be copying, and it will be analog. Off in the ozone... tfinn@crash.cts.com (Preferred) The Finn/ VLA