179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
theREAL
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:24:19 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] Point 7
Msg-Id:
<49F1CB93.30802@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:
<SNT104-W44040DA6C24B87E8DB558CFA720@phx.gbl>
Mbox:
idm.0904.gz
In terms of making comparisons to Point 7, in most cases, these seem like apples next to the exemplary orange. The Hidden Persuader record is electro. For me electro is either really good or tedious, the latter being by far the most populous category. I've been listening to electro since it crawled out between Kraftwerk and b-boys, and I don't hear anything special here. The Eero Johannes is indeed interesting, but the only reason to cast it in the problematic nomenclature of idm is because of a lack of appropriate signifiers. It's more of a collision between synth pop and electronic soul with some clever moves. The Loneshark ep delivered, in my opinion, one really nice track ("Battle Gongs") and another good one ("Pirates"); the two 'in the middle' seemed less worthy to my ears, creating a sort of sandwich that shows promise but has too much crust. The Infinite Scale is the most appropo in terms of genre, but although it's a good record, it doesn't add up to the same quality throughout as the Point 7 does in my ears. For the record, there are elements of the Point 7 I don't like, e.g. that tinge of rave afterwash. Admittedly, using my own construct of idm (which is unusually rigid for me, if only for the sake of making my point here), that rings genuine to the 90's-ish patina on the record. jeff Jon Jon wrote:
quoted 35 lines OK, of course it’s all relative, because what I think is good someone> OK, of course it’s all relative, because what I think is good someone > else will think is gash, but some music that has been doing the do for > me is: > > > > Hidden Persuader – Electrocratic > > Infinite Scale – Ad infinitum > > *Eero Johannes - Eero Johannes* > > *Loneshark - *Synchromatic** > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:14:07 > > ** > > -0400 > > From: theREALmxyzptlk@comcast.net > > CC: idm@hyperreal.org > > Subject: Re: [idm] Point 7 > > > > Much better. All I wanted was some sense of what you're trying to say. > > You could even go a step further and name some of this year's artists > > whom you think excel beyond this - because I haven't heard them, and > > I've heard a thing or two. Even better would be why you think they're > > better than the Point 7. > > > > > > jeff