179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
n3wjack
To:
Date:
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:07:59 +0200
Subject:
Re: [idm] Csound, programmatic music
Msg-Id:
<320647220710180007i25631944v535d6b55d14e3266@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<ff94cb110710172045u3445f772y8186fbbb034ebe2c@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0710.gz
2007/10/18, Josh Clayton <claytonster@gmail.com>:
quoted 8 lines There are plenty of musicians, not many of which fall neatly into the IDM> > There are plenty of musicians, not many of which fall neatly into the IDM > category, that exclusively use tools like Csound, ChucK, Supercollider, > Max, > etc. to make their music. I'd say they're more on the academically > experimental side of things, like Florian Hecker or Iannis Xenakis. > Probably lots of professors and students of music technology and related > fields.
I read that Autechre uses Max/DSP with homemade patches, but that's about it. I wouldn't call it "limiting" either using stuff like this. There are hardly any limits when you get down to programming your own patches or software, but the learning curve is pretty steep. I started trying out Chuck and PureData at some point, but I found it too much work to come up with anything sounding good enough. It's not about writing music anymore with these kind of tools. It's more about programming your own sound. Which is cool, but something completely different. -- "progress doesn't come from early risers progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things" http://n3wjack.net http://www.jungletrain.net - 24/7 dnb radio station