179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
anti_stunna
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:55:27 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD
Msg-Id:
<20060211035527.93130.qmail@web33810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:
<1139459423.78122.ezmlm@hyperreal.org>
Mbox:
idm.0602.gz
If you have discs burned 10 years ago and haven't seen any deterioration you're extremely lucky. I have (had) quite a few dating to just mid 1998 and among those are many that have been "bronzed"... http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/9771 ...as well as a few whose labels became torn or flaked off, rendering them unreadable. And that's while storing discs in a cool, dark, dry place, upright, and without any drops, dings, etc. To coin a phrase "download once, burn twice." anti_stunna --- therealmxyzptlk@comcast.net wrote: CD-rs do not have a coating over the data, so they naturally have a shorter lifespan and will not take abuse without scratching the data layer. That said, I have cdrs which were burned 10 years ago and play fine. I'm not saying everyone will get the same mileage - but I am saying I've been burning for a long time and have yet to see ANY disc deterioration. jeff __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org