179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Carlo Caputo ,
Date:
Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:44:10 +0000
Subject:
Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD
Msg-Id:
<020720061644.12785.43E8CE5A0003C95A000031F1220075894202070A04059F06@comcast.net>
Mbox:
idm.0602.gz
CD-rs do not have a coating over the data, so they naturally have a shorter lifespan and will not take abuse without scratching the data layer. That said, I have cdrs which were burned 10 years ago and play fine. I'm not saying everyone will get the same mileage - but I am saying I've been burning for a long time and have yet to see ANY disc deterioration. jeff -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Carlo Caputo <zed@9hells.org>
quoted 10 lines CD-R have a smaller lifetime, than pressed media.> CD-R have a smaller lifetime, than pressed media. > > http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/12933 > > <dhtmled3://news/submit>an expert physicist Kurt Gerecke that works > > for IBM Deutschland has warned users not to use CD-R's for long term > > backups. His advice is that if you don?t want to keep backing up the > > same discs every few years use magnetic tape backup instead. Kurt went > > on to say that unlike pressed CD?s, burnt CD-R?s lifetime is much > > shorter with lifetime ranging from just 2 to 5 years depending on the > > quality of the disc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org