179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Alan Lockett
To:
Date:
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:19:58 +0000
Subject:
Re: [idm] indie killed the idm star?
Msg-Id:
<535049DDB7CE84A910787918@user-2283.lns1-c10.dsl.pol.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<200601101320.AA135070654@chthonicstreams.com>
Mbox:
idm.0601.gz
--On 10 January 2006 13:20 -0800 chthonic <chthonic@chthonicstreams.com> wrote:
quoted 10 lines so... then could that be summed up as saying, "the people who like IDM>> so... then could that be summed up as saying, "the people who like IDM >> killed IDM"? >> >> :) >> >> joshua. > > > heh. well that would presume i am declaring IDM "dead"...and no one with > half a brain would touch that thread with a 12k pole.
Yes. Look at 'rock'. I'm aware that people (mostly journalists) have been declaring that 'Rock is dead' since at least 1975 (with a frequency rivalled only by trumpetings about the "Future of Rock'n'Roll"). Now, if rock is indeed dead, then it's certainly left a corpse that, if not exactly 'good-looking', is still enacting a passable Imitation of Life. So a few labels have closed down... that's not necessarily an indication of ill-health, let alone the Death of a Genre. In addition to the impact of wider availability of this music on a shared/pillaged basis, could it not also be partly because of the inability to sustain the larger number of labels now in existence that were initiated on the back of interest created by a once smaller number of labels? Just a thought. alan ---------------------- Alan Lockett (Senior Language Co-ordinator - EFL) Language Centre, University of Bristol, 30-32 Tyndall's Park Road, Bristol, BS8 1PY, UK tel: +44 (0)117 3310914 e-mail: Alan.R.Lockett@bristol.ac.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org