179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Luis-Manuel Garcia
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:04:54 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] microhouse rabbittrail
Msg-Id:
<7ccb36849eb9503f35788e99af2ea028@uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<013001c530a0$18d52690$44f9640a@stargate.local>
Mbox:
idm.0503.gz
On Mar 24, 2005, at 12:34 PM, cutups wrote:
quoted 4 lines Awesome topic. I think its one that can be applied to any music> Awesome topic. I think its one that can be applied to any music > or idea really, but it works really well for certain styles that have > that > repetitious noteriety.
Interestingly enough, I read a paper on just this topic last fall at the meeting of the Society for Music Theory (yes, such a thing exists). Essentially, I tried to historicize the bad rap that repetition has developed (in music, that is) and then theorized about the pleasures of listening to "repetitive" music (my examples included Plastikman, Tony Rohr and Akufen/M.Leclair). Anyway, it seems to me that the bias against repeating/repetitive music is a relatively new thing. On the one hand, 19th and 20th century composers were increasingly interested in deconstructing traditional musical forms (which were really large-scale repetitive schemes). In addition, Freud added fuel to the fire by pathologizing repetition as regressive and childlike (Schoenberg picks up on this in his didactic writings on composition). And then Adorno probably made the most aggressive attack on repetition in music, linking it to fascism, social control, loss of the self, and pseudo-individuation/individualism. So, there's been an ongoing discourse against repetition since the late 1800s at least. When you consider IDM's efforts to align itself with "avant-garde" aesthetics, the bias against repetition becomes less puzzling... nap time! Luis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org