179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Greg Hill
To:
max
Cc:
IDM
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:10:13 -0800
Subject:
Re: [idm] Autechre WTF Tour
Msg-Id:
<02ed01c512f2$b8800370$6501a8c0@your46e94owx6a>
Mbox:
idm.0502.gz
not an industrial fan here.... probably explains why I don't like most of AE's stuff. ----- Original Message ----- From: "max" <max0666@cox.net> Cc: "IDM" <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 4:05 PM Subject: Re: [idm] Autechre WTF Tour
quoted 36 lines On Feb 14, 2005, at 5:07 PM, ersatz-noddy wrote:> > On Feb 14, 2005, at 5:07 PM, ersatz-noddy wrote: > > > I don't know. Amber to me is pop. Granted, it's murkier than Plaid > > but, for all intents and purposes, it's catchy, hooky, even pretty, > > like pop. I know, I know, you've built an entire personality and > > social life upon not viewing much of this music as "popular music" > > but--to me--that's what it is. > > > > in reality so much of the so-called 'IDM' is... 'Pop' or whatever, all > the Incunabula and Amber are absolute brilliance. > > > > Am I the only one in the room who liked Confield? Do you have to be > > able to fuck to it for it to be good? Doesn't anybody see the > > brilliance in "Pen Expers"? > > I liked it... it was certainly an evolving sound emerging... in this > aspect however, reaction is spectronomically individualized =) > > > > I don't know. I came to IDM through experimental, early industrial, > > and 60s-70s kraut music, not Depeche Mode. Sorry. > > Same here, the natural progression from Throbbing Gristle to Autechre > has been smooth as hell for me. > > np: Throbbing Gristle vs. Autechre > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org