179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Adam Piontek
To:
Date:
Mon, 08 Nov 2004 16:02:57 -0500
Subject:
[idm] 'mac vs pc' vs 'digital vs analog'
Msg-Id:
<418FDF01.5040407@damek.org>
Mbox:
idm.0411.gz
Which is the better argument? I think the Mac vs PC argument is better than the 'Digital vs Analog' argument, for a number of reasons: 1) We've had the 'digital vs analog' argument a number of times on this list, about types of music, types of media, etc. It's pretty old, and annoying to see the same ground retread over and over. The 'mac vs pc' argument comes up less often and is therefore kept fresher. 2) The 'digital vs analog' isn't so political, so it doesn't have as many harsh emotions attached to it. It doesn't get as heated and people are more quick to "agree to disagree." This makes it boring. Oh, and anyone who disagrees with me is a stupid baldy. Yeah, you heard me, bald people! You're stupid! Having hair is so much better than being bald. -Adam. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org