179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
chthonic
To:
Date:
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:50:25 -0800
Subject:
Re: [idm] ubiquitous sony
Msg-Id:
<200311251250.AA58852722@chthonicstreams.com>
Mbox:
idm.0311.gz
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Eggy Toast" <eggy@eggtastic.com> Reply-To: eggy@eggtastic.com Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:33:18 -0500 (EST)
quoted 2 lines It's little wonder we haven't seen them try to build houses and>It's little wonder we haven't seen them try to build houses and >apartments to house the artists in question, forcing them to live
there
quoted 1 line and pay rent, giving even more money back to Sony ;D>and pay rent, giving even more money back to Sony ;D
does sony own any recording studios? that would hit the artists two ways at once. a lot of bands move into a studio (such as the house where both the cure and radiohead recorded albums). if sony (or any other label) owned any of those, they'd be making the money back that was spent making the album as well as housing them. not to mention the in-house chef... d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org