179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Adam Piontek
To:
Date:
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:17:13 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] ATP (ae) track and crappy MP3 encoding
Msg-Id:
<200304150817.13110.adam@damek.org>
In-Reply-To:
<Law10-F29lrg2nRySLp000078ff@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0304.gz
People are still using MP3? Come on, get with it... http://www.vorbis.com/ -Adam On Monday 14 April 2003 11:04 pm, alan flood wrote: [...]
quoted 10 lines Speaking of encoding mp3's .......... who the hell encodes at bitrates> Speaking of encoding mp3's .......... who the hell encodes at bitrates > lower than 192?????? Soulseek and the like are filled with tracks and > albums that are encoded at 128 and 160. Pretty moronic if you ask > me......even more moronic are the people who download these low quality > tracks and actually listen to them. It should be a law that you mujst > encode at 192 or higher. I guess some people like listening to there tracks > with the bandwith noise reduction hiss and sizzle. > > > alan flood
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org