179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Clint Anderson
To:
kent williams
Cc:
do id
Date:
Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:14:34 -0500
Subject:
Re: Moon B is pissing me off...
Msg-Id:
<CAFhVXM92KV3JToQZkiJ2czKdCfbv-gKxc3OKte0tDAViYD7TqQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CAG9msJYi-nJj_hejzGGRGZOe33No9BZ4_fNyeyZ3TaJkS5=HPw@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2019-06.gz
if you can explain to me how a group doesn't suffer while the individuals in it are suffering, you'll have well and truly triumphed over both logic and grammar it sounds like a logical assertion, yet careful examination reveals a lack of any actual hard logic Clint Anderson Systems Engineer "Freedom -- paint me a picture!" -- Burton Cummings On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:09 PM kent williams <chaircrusher@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 48 lines He uses bits of this:> He uses bits of this: > https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/philosophy/new-years-letter/ > "A close reading of 20th century history indicates, as nothing else can, > the horrors that accompany loss of faith in the idea of the individual. It > is only the individual, after all, who suffers. The group does not suffer – > only those who compose it. Thus, the reality of the individual must be > regarded as primary if suffering is to be regarded seriously. Without such > regard, there can be no motivation to reduce suffering and, therefore, no > respite. Instead, the production of individual suffering can and has and > will be again rationalized and justified for its supposed benefits for the > future and the group." > > Discussing this is as difficult (and off topic here) as anything Peterson > says or writes. He says all sorts of things that in isolation can seem > reasonable, but it's always in service of one of his cockamamie conclusions > that are ahistorical, wooly-minded and wrong, and yet irresistible to > people of a particular turn of mind. Just this one quote above can appeal > to all of us who regard ourselves as unique individuals, who want to > determine our own path through life. But it is a buttress to a large > argument that is misogynistic, reductive, and deeply silly. "The primary > image for women is not the Divine Individual, because of the heavy burden > they bear for reproduction." > > And once again Professor FroggyVoice has suckered me into spending more > time than it is worthy of to deconstruct his idiocy. Damn him and his > tweedy speciousness! > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:03 AM Connor Higgins <connor1higgins@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Lol, which quote? Is it the one about taming your internal chaos dragon >> by over-dissecting Disney classics? >> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 8:38 AM kent williams <chaircrusher@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> ...by including a big Jordan Peterson sample in a track on his new >>> record "Udaya", not out yet. >>> >>> Why Wes why? >>> >>> ...and if you haven't heard Moon B, I'm intrigued by his stuff, which is >>> pretty originally derivative. He's kind of in the middle of the styistic >>> triangle of Com Truise, Boards Of Canada, and Vaporwave. Real nostalgia >>> for an imaginary musical past. >>> >>>